24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sdulpp

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 197.5
帖子: 16
在线: 40.5小时
虫号: 1135138
注册: 2010-10-30
性别: GG
专业: 传热传质学

[求助] APL投稿被拒，大家看一下可以修改再投吗？

编辑回信是：
Your manuscript, referenced below, has been reviewed for Applied Physics Letters.
Attached or included below is the report of the reviewer. In view of his/her recommendations, we cannot accept your paper for publication in this Journal.
审稿人意见是：
Editor's / Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Reject

Paper Interesting: ?
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: Yes
Clear and Error Free: No
Conclusions Supported: Yes
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Satisfactory English: No
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: Yes
OVERALL RATING: ?
大家看一下，是修改后继续投APL，还是投别的杂志啊？导师让修改继续投，但是感觉文章第一次给审稿人的印象并不好。迷茫中!

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

投稿精细化工已经有6人回复
博士读完未来一定会好吗已经有36人回复
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？已经有10人回复
博士申请都是内定的吗？已经有9人回复
心脉受损已经有8人回复
读博已经有5人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

被拒还可以修改后再投同一个杂志吗？已经有14人回复
APL被拒之后，又给我发邮件让我投稿，是怎么回事已经有26人回复
JMPT投稿被拒，可以好好修改后再投这个吗？？已经有5人回复
被一个杂志拒了，修改后还可以再投吗？已经有8人回复
APL的被拒之后已经有15人回复
第一次投稿被拒了，大家帮我看看还有没有希望修改后重投。谢谢！！！！！已经有10人回复
请问大家，投稿被拒后，能不能修改后再重新投！已经有10人回复
论文被拒修改之后可不可以再投原杂志已经有13人回复
稿件被拒经修改是否可再投原期刊已经有7人回复
APL 被拒了还会有revise链接吗已经有17人回复

1楼2011-07-26 10:34:31

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

wrm

银虫 (著名写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 988.5
散金: 94
红花: 6
帖子: 1377
在线: 166.2小时
虫号: 161297
注册: 2006-01-09
性别: MM
专业: optics

PL的这个意见，能修改再投吗，大修？大家给点建议。再投否？

DEAR
Thank you for submitting your manuscript, referenced below, to APL.

We have examined your paper, and our consensus is that it does not contain a strong component of new applied physics and does not meet the timeliness requirement for rapid publication in this Letters Journal. We are therefore returning the manuscript so that you can seek publication elsewhere.

As you may be aware, we receive many more papers than we can accept, and many of them are in competitive sub-fields. Consequently, we are compelled to reduce our coverage of certain areas, even though they may have appeared in our pages in the past. Such decisions are difficult but are necessary to control the explosion in Journal size. We wish to make it clear that this is not a reflection of the technical quality of your work but rather of our discipline and stringent space limitations.

Sincerely yours,