| 查看: 941 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见（环境方面的）
|
||
|
1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option). 2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue（估计是true） is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有9人回复
-
为什么一个当量的苯甲醛反应不完呢
已经有5人回复
-
招博士
已经有3人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有35人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有8人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
-
求推荐博导
已经有4人回复
-
求助一下有机合成大神
已经有4人回复
-
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
-
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？
已经有10人回复
zss99
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8740.6
- 帖子: 927
- 在线: 60.4小时
- 虫号: 564810
- 注册: 2008-05-28
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 基因组学
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44