| 查看: 1051 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见（环境方面的）
|
||
|
1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option). 2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue（估计是true） is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国自科送审了吗
已经有7人回复
-
收到国自然专家邀请后几年才会有本子送过来评
已经有5人回复
-
研究生做的很差，你们会让毕业吗？
已经有6人回复
-
26年博士申请自荐-电催化
已经有5人回复
-
2026博士或科研助理转27年博士
已经有5人回复
-
夜，静悄悄的
已经有4人回复
-
考博
已经有6人回复
-
一篇MDPI论文改变了学习工作和生活
已经有5人回复
-
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉
已经有4人回复
zss99
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8740.6
- 帖子: 927
- 在线: 60.4小时
- 虫号: 564810
- 注册: 2008-05-28
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 基因组学
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44