24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 914  |  回复: 1
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看

dxiaoqing

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

[求助] 英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见(环境方面的)

1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option).
2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue(估计是true) is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics.
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zss99

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

dxiaoqing(金币+10, 翻译EPI+1): 非常感谢,有了您的回答,基本知道审稿人想要什么了,thanks 2011-07-25 18:36:03
1文章假设水资源价格较低。并且产物量的减少主要由于原料的损失。因此,我建议你在政策介绍中应加上一些内容,例如,增加原料的价格(含税),考虑处理污染的费用(尽管我觉得处理污染费用对政策影响不大)。
2 你没有给出关于产品改良和消费者沟通的例子,这是最有效的预防检查技术。这些应该在文中探讨,当然这写比传统的处理方法要困难。建议你最好对这些话题进行一些讨论。
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 dxiaoqing 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见