| 查看: 1098 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见（环境方面的）
|
||
|
1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option). 2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue（估计是true） is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
E0414, 我的本子有没有希望？
已经有7人回复
-
有谁可曾问过你过的还好吗？
已经有17人回复
-
一篇论文同时出现在两个期刊，一模一样，这算不算学术不端，请各位老师斧正。
已经有12人回复
-
希望面上有个好结果
已经有7人回复
-
今年也是没消息就是没中么
已经有16人回复
-
三区计算机方向期刊推荐
已经有5人回复
-
sci论文二审求助
已经有5人回复
-
函评
已经有7人回复
-
买卖文章的刷屏了！
已经有3人回复
zss99
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8740.6
- 帖子: 927
- 在线: 60.4小时
- 虫号: 564810
- 注册: 2008-05-28
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 基因组学
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44