| 查看: 959 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见（环境方面的）
|
||
|
1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option). 2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue（估计是true） is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有9人回复
-
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有3人回复
-
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生｜MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有5人回复
-
有70后还继续奋斗在职场上的吗？
已经有6人回复
-
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有7人回复
-
退学或坚持读
已经有27人回复
-
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有5人回复
-
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复
zss99
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8740.6
- 帖子: 927
- 在线: 60.4小时
- 虫号: 564810
- 注册: 2008-05-28
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 基因组学
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44