| 查看: 1066 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见（环境方面的）
|
||
|
1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option). 2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue（估计是true） is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士申请
已经有4人回复
-
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有7人回复
-
论文撤稿了
已经有9人回复
-
青B发送上会通知了吗
已经有10人回复
-
化学专业申博
已经有5人回复
-
招收2026级博士生
已经有5人回复
-
宿州学院学报
已经有3人回复
-
4,4二甲基联苯干啥用，有懂得吗
已经有3人回复
-
医学类期刊求推荐
已经有6人回复
-
26/27申博自荐
已经有10人回复
zss99
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8740.6
- 帖子: 927
- 在线: 60.4小时
- 虫号: 564810
- 注册: 2008-05-28
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 基因组学
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44