| 查看: 934 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见（环境方面的）
|
||
|
1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option). 2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue（估计是true） is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有5人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有6人回复
-
推荐一本书
已经有8人回复
-
溴的反应液脱色
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有5人回复
-
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
zss99
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8740.6
- 帖子: 927
- 在线: 60.4小时
- 虫号: 564810
- 注册: 2008-05-28
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 基因组学
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44