| 查看: 1142 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见（环境方面的）
|
||
|
1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option). 2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue（估计是true） is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
生命口会评
已经有7人回复
-
今年E04面上
已经有23人回复
-
27届辽宁大学应届毕业生申博
已经有3人回复
-
关于如何从代码看上不上会
已经有23人回复
-
大龄残疾硕士的一点执念
已经有25人回复
-
chemdraw
已经有6人回复
-
祈祷青基必中
已经有10人回复
-
b口会评
已经有6人回复
-
信息学部会评时间
已经有3人回复
-
在职考研
已经有7人回复
zss99
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8740.6
- 帖子: 927
- 在线: 60.4小时
- 虫号: 564810
- 注册: 2008-05-28
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 基因组学
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44