| 查看: 991 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[求助]
英译中——投稿后审稿人的审稿意见（环境方面的）
|
|||
|
1.In the case of water is this problem an extreme given its very low starting price. Non product output loses are in this case usually formed mainly by lost raw materials which become pollution. Given this observation I was missing in your policy review some more options like to increase price of the input materials (through their taxation) or to introduce additional pollution fee (in my opinion less effective policy option). 2.You exclude for example product modification and communication with customer which can be in this case often the most effective preventative technique. What is thrue（估计是true） is that these options are being explored only if there are significant difficulties (as result of new policies) to run the traditional process. Maybe you could consider to introduce at least some discussion on these topics. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
288求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
281求调剂（0805）
已经有19人回复
-
材料考研调剂
已经有3人回复
-
346求调剂[0856]
已经有6人回复
-
294求调剂材料与化工专硕
已经有9人回复
-
328求调剂，英语六级551，有科研经历
已经有12人回复
-
一志愿西安交通大学材料工程专业 282分求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
085601材料工程专硕求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
321求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿中海洋材料工程专硕330分求调剂
已经有7人回复
zss99
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8740.6
- 帖子: 927
- 在线: 60.4小时
- 虫号: 564810
- 注册: 2008-05-28
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 基因组学
2楼2011-07-25 17:38:44
