24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2789)
>虫友互识 (282)
>文献求助 (106)
>导师招生 (97)
>休闲灌水 (60)
>硕博家园 (52)
>论文投稿 (39)
>考博 (38)
>考研 (22)
>博后之家 (20)
>论文道贺祈福 (17)
>教师之家 (15)
>招聘信息布告栏 (14)
>基金申请 (14)
>催化 (13)
>有机交流 (12)

返回列表

wdl23

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 192.8
散金: 102
帖子: 55
在线: 31.2小时
虫号: 865594
注册: 2009-10-08
专业: 金属材料表面科学与工程

[求助] 求助论文投稿5天就有了审稿意见

论文投了5天之后就有了回复，要求修改，不知道是什么情况，怀疑是不是没有经过审稿人啊，不知道能否接收。麻烦大家给个意见，谢谢大家了！

审稿意见如下：

We have now received reviewers' comments on the above submission. I am pleased to tell you that the work is found to be of interest but there are a number of points which need your attention before a decision can be reached. The points are detailed in the comments below.

Comments from the Editors and Reviewers:

Reviewer #1: This subject has been well researched, most notably by these authors. Another two (self) citations in the paper would be useful:
Page 1, with reference to Ti-B2-contained iron-based coatings: Wang et al, Surface and Coatings Technology , 201(6), 2006, pp 2500-2504.
Also: Wang et al, Surface and Coatings Technology, 192(2-3), 2005, pp 257-262.

The paper is appropriately brief and uses a 4-sample study backed by good figures to establish hardness gradients and a believable model for melt pool processes leading to the final microstructures. I believe this model is original and, although not proved absolutely by the limited study, is credible - certainly enough so to be of interest to the wider scientific community. As the model / theory of what happens in the melt pool is the highlight I am surprised it is not mentioned in the paper title.

Minor corrections
Page 1 '?become one of the hotspots.' Is not correct scientific English
Page 1 ''And then more attention was paid?' should read 'More attention was then paid?'
Page 1 'However, full preparation has not been made on?'. Do the authors mean 'However, full attention has not been given to?.'?
Page 3 '22 min-1 torch swing?' Use SI units ('0.367 Hz torch swing?')
Page 4 'And Leitz?' should read 'A Leitz?'
Page 5 'And the small quantity of TiB2 whiskers mainly distribute near the surface of the pool due to long time floating' is incorrect English. It could read 'The small quantity of TiB2 whiskers are distributed mainly near the surface of the pool due to the long time allowed for them to float'.
Page 5 Use of the term 'Gradient curve' is confusing and I recommend it be removed. An 'evenly distributed gradient curve' could be more correctly described as an 'approximately constant microhardness gradient'.
Page 6 Use of the term 'Gradient curve' is again confusing and it should be replaced with a more meaningful term. 'That absolutely reveals the gradient distribution of TiB2 whiskers' could better read 'This absolutely reveals the concentration gradient of the TiB2 whiskers'. Similarly, 'The reason of the gradient distribution is analyzed as follows' could better read 'The concentration gradient can be explained as follows.'
Figure 5: It is very easy to confuse the lines for samples 2 and 3. The graph should be made clearer by, for example, making the symbols for these lines less similar.

回复此楼