24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4006  |  回复: 7

胡伟

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] gaussian view 打开fchk文件出现问题

在超算上计算的Gaussian,做完计算后,用formchk命令把chk转成fchk后,用gaussian view也打不开fchk文件,出现以下提示:
CConnectionGFCHK:arse_GFCHK()
Missing or bad data: Alpha Orbital Energies
Last line read = 669


这是什么原因啊?怎么解决?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

oyljw

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

格物致知Professional


zhou2009(金币+1): 2011-08-19 21:26:26
http://www.ccl.net/cca/archived-messages/11/04/01
这个里面有提及  不过我没看懂 正郁闷中.....
独立之精神自由之思想
2楼2011-08-19 20:57:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

oyljw

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

格物致知Professional

PLEASE ADVISE ME AS TO WHY THE FOLLOWING ERROR IS COMING UP WHENEVER I OPEN A .CHK FILE IN G09W.

CConnectionGFCHK::parse-GFCHK()
Missing or bad data: Alpha Orbital Energies
Line Number 702
From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Apr  1 03:50:00 2011
From: "Andrew Voronkov drugdesign%yandex.ru"
To: CCL
Subject: CCL: Are there LigandScout users here?
Sent to CCL by: Andrew Voronkov [drugdesign[]yandex.ru]
Hello! I am interested to find other LigandScout users to be able to discuss questions related to software work, I have several questions on LigandScout 3.0.
Subject: CCL: absolute hardness
Before you get too far in your calculations, you should probably read the
references I have provided below.  While the theoretical basis for Absolute
Electronegativity and Absolute Hardness is well grounded, the calculations
are not as straight forward as some would have you believe.  Most moderate
to high level QM calculations will give you a pretty good value for the
ionization potential (I) (or the HOMO energy if you are using the Koopman's
theorem approach).

However, the electron affinity (A) is another matter.  The "natural" way to
calculate I and A for use in hardness calculations is from total electronic
energy calculations on the N-1, N and N+1 electron systems using the
geometry of the neutral molecule. I is then I=E(N-1)-E(N) and A is
E(N)-E(N-1). The Koopmans approach assigns I as -HOMO energy  and A as -LUMO
energy.  The problem arises when negative electon affinities are encountered
as a result of the DFT calculations.  The values you get for A are often
dicated by the size of the diffuse orbitals used in the calculation

The cautions about using electron affinities calculated using standand DFT
methods and some work arounds are described in Proft et al. Faraday
Discussions 135, 151 (2007), Tozer and Proft,  J Phys Chem A109, 8923
(2005), Puiatu et al., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 10, 1394 (2008),
  Puiatu et al., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 11, 9013 (2009)
> Dear all
>    I need some information on the molecular absolute hardness in my study,
> but I don't know how to calculate it and which data I  need to compute in
> gaussion 09. Therefore, I need a detail computational process, formulas or
> examples on gaining the molecular absolute hardness.
>    Any help will be appreciated, I am looking forward to your timely reply
>    Sincerely yours>
Before you get too far in your calculations, you should probably read the r=
eferences I have provided below.=A0 While the theoretical basis for Absolut=
e Electronegativity and Absolute Hardness is well grounded, the calculation=
s are not as straight forward as some would have you believe.=A0 Most moder=
ate to high level QM calculations will give you a pretty good value for the=
ionization potential (I) (or the HOMO energy if you are using the Koopman&=
#39;s theorem approach).=A0


However, the electron affinity (A) is another matter.=A0 The "natu=
ral" way to calculate I and A for use in hardness calculations is from=
total electronic energy calculations on the N-1, N and N+1 electron system=
s using the geometry of the neutral molecule. I is then I=3DE(N-1)-E(N) and=
A is E(N)-E(N-1). The Koopmans approach assigns I as -HOMO energy=A0 and A=
as -LUMO energy.=A0 The problem arises when negative electon affinities ar=
e encountered as a result of the DFT calculations.=A0 The values you get fo=
r A are often dicated by the size of the diffuse orbitals used in the calcu=
lation


The cautions about using electron affinities calculated using standand =
DFT methods and some work arounds are described in Proft et al. Faraday Dis=
cussions 135, 151 (2007), Tozer and Proft,=A0 J Phys Chem A109, 8923 (2005)=
, Puiatu et al., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 10, 1394 (2008),=A0 =
=A0 Puiatu et al., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 11, 9013 (2009)

=A0 =A0I need some information on the molecular absolute hardness in my st=
udy, but I don't know how to calculate it and which data I =A0need to c=
ompute in gaussion 09. Therefore, I need a detail computational process, fo=
rmulas or examples on gaining the molecular absolute hardness.


=A0 =A0Any help will be appreciated, I am looking forward to your timely reply
Sent to CCL by: "Adrian  Stevens" [adrian.stevens],[accelrys.com]
As part of the release of Discovery Studio 3.0, Accelrys is very pleased to announce the extension of our webinar series to now include customer and software partner-led presentations.     


Subject: CCL: absolute hardness
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Apr  1 23:26:00 2011
From: "Peng Yun ericyunp- -gmail.com"
To: CCL
Subject: CCL:G: About antiferromagnetic coupling

  Thanks for Dr.Gorelsky's suggestion,but the problem I faced now is how to
choose the orbital to be reordered or--if I use AOMix--how to choose the
fragment?In Gaussian's examples,they didn't say much about this.Is there any
references that can be helpful?
  Any suggestions will be appreciated!
  Many thanks in advance.
  > Dear CCLers:
  >  I'm new to Gaussian,so I try to reproduce some example at Gaussian's
  > website.But I'm confused about one.In the "Antiferromagnetic
  coupling"
  > example of gauss03--www.gaussian.com/g_tech/antiferr_g03.htm--it tries to
  > reorder the orbitals,and choose some orbitals changed to .What I'm
  > confused is the criterion that it choose the orbitals to be reordered.Why
  >they choose these orbitals to be reordered.
  >yes, that's indeed a confusing method. A much better (simpler and 100%
  >reliable) method is to take fragment orbitals and generate an
  >appropriate guess wavefunction. See Appendix II of the AOMix manual
  >(http://www.sg-chem.net/aomix/AOMix-manual.pdf) for details.
  >Best regards,
  > Serge Gorelsky
独立之精神自由之思想
3楼2011-08-19 22:05:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

oyljw

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

格物致知Professional

★ ★
zhou2009(金币+2): 2011-08-20 21:35:23
http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2193788

这个也许对你有帮助!!!!!!!!!!!!
独立之精神自由之思想
4楼2011-08-20 10:23:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

oyljw

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

格物致知Professional

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
zhou2009(金币+2): 2011-08-20 21:35:55
胡伟(金币+10): 2011-09-22 17:34:40
把chk文件转换成fchk文件
打开fchk文件
fchk文件中的开头部分中有一行
Number of independent functions

把其中的independent改成independant就行了

我试过 管用!
独立之精神自由之思想
5楼2011-08-20 11:52:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

139564@chen

金虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
1451591楼: Originally posted by oyljw at 2011-08-20 11:52:43
把chk文件转换成fchk文件
打开fchk文件
fchk文件中的开头部分中有一行
Number of independent functions

把其中的independent改成independant就行了

我试过 管用!

真的可以!谢谢!但是打开之后,visuaize键不能用啊!转化不到可视化的分子轨道,求教,谢谢!
杂草 就要用杂草的方式去生活
6楼2012-08-14 17:01:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

oyljw

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

格物致知Professional

引用回帖:
1573274楼: Originally posted by 139564@chen at 2012-08-14 17:01:03
真的可以!谢谢!但是打开之后,visuaize键不能用啊!转化不到可视化的分子轨道,求教,谢谢!...

我当时的那样做能显示轨道啊
独立之精神自由之思想
7楼2012-08-14 19:02:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

duanruihong

铜虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by oyljw at 2012-08-14 19:02:25
我当时的那样做能显示轨道啊...

我试了5楼的方法,确实可行,谢谢 @lyljw,楼主的Visualize不能用是否是因为没有装PC版Gauss?
8楼2014-03-22 21:27:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 胡伟 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写 +4 且听虎啸 2026-08-17 5/250 2026-08-18 00:49 by 蔡棒棒菂
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +37 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 86/4300 2026-08-18 00:18 by longsantaizi
[基金申请] filecode=后面第一个是大写字母 +8 wangze12014 2026-08-14 10/500 2026-08-17 17:05 by xter9665
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +4 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 4/200 2026-08-17 16:10 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +12 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 15/750 2026-08-17 15:02 by 小豌豆_发芽
[基金申请] 今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜! +8 zju2000 2026-08-16 9/450 2026-08-17 12:20 by lmz0216
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +13 archvillain 2026-08-15 25/1250 2026-08-16 20:13 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 2027广东省杰青 +3 奶牛小黑 2026-08-15 6/300 2026-08-16 20:07 by 奶牛小黑
[基金申请] 快农历七夕节了,轻松一下,男人悄悄话,女施主请不要进来。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 17:47 by jurkat.1640
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +7 启萌科技 2026-08-12 26/1300 2026-08-16 12:35 by 启萌科技
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +10 majunge000 2026-08-11 12/600 2026-08-16 08:18 by xli1984
[精细化工] 招聘 金属平磨液,抛光液研发工程师 +3 小天0311 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 07:31 by H9PLUS
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +4 yuleib84 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 23:05 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 重要来源:本周末出结果 +10 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-12 10/500 2026-08-13 15:46 by likettle
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
[基金申请] Filecode 又变了,巨变 +3 WH3796 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 14:13 by 小木虫6752397
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
信息提示
请填处理意见