| ²é¿´: 661 | »Ø¸´: 4 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
liugsh1985½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
˸ø³ö¸öÖ÷Òâ°¡£¡
|
||
|
Ïë²Î¼Ó¸ö¹ú¼Ê»áÒ飬µ¼Ê¦ÈÃÕûÀíÏÂËûµÄÎÄÕ£¬ÔÙ½áºÏЩÊý¾Ý£¬Ð´ÁË»áÒéÂÛÎÄ¡£ÓÉÓÚʱ¼ä±È½Ï²Ö´Ù£¬Ö»ÊǶԵ¼Ê¦µÄÎÄÕ½øÐÐËõ¼õ×ܽᣬûÓÐÌí¼Óж«Î÷£¬ÂÛÎĵÄͼ±íҲûÓб䶯¡£¸ø»áÒé±à¼Ð´ÐÅ£¬»ØÐÅÈçÏ£¬ËÄܰïæ³ö¸öÖ÷Ò⣬Ôõô½â¾ö£¬Íò·½¸Ðл£¡ It is unclear to me whether this paper is a copy of what you published in J. Hydrology, or a summary of a more substantial paper. If it is a summary ¨C as appropriate to a symposium poster, then that will be acceptable, but you should cite the J Hydrology paper. We will not accept and publish the identical paper again; you would be not only breaking our rules and those of Elsevier who publish J Hydrology, but also academic ethos whereby you do not publish the same twice over. I am sure you do not intend the latter, but you should be open in your poster/paper about previous publication of fuller information ¨C you do nott appear to refer to it. Note, if any of the diagrams/tables are the same as in the J Hydrol paper, you need to have and refer to permission from Elsevier ¨C they will give it as it was your paper originally. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0854Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÏà¹Ø×¨Òµ344Çóµ÷¼ÁË«·Ç¹¤¿ÆÑ§Ð£»ò¿ÎÌâ×é
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»¦9£¬326ÇóÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ÓÊÜÈκε÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§070300 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ29È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Ͷ¸åSCIÆÚ¿¯£¨Ð¡ÐÞ£©£¬±à¼¸øµÄÒâ¼û£¬ÓоÑéµÄ³æÓÑÃǸø³ö³öÖ÷Òâ°¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
´ÇÖ°³ö¹ú£¬µ¥Î»Ë÷ÅâÔõô°ì£¿
ÒѾÓÐ29È˻ظ´
ÂíÉÏÃæÁÙÁ½µØ·Ö¾Ó£¬´ó¼Ò¸ø³öÖ÷Òâ°¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ50È˻ظ´
ÈÕÓïÎÄÏ×·ÒëÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿µ¼Ê¦ÒªÇó¼û¸öÃæ£¬´øµãɶ¼ûÃæÀñºÃÄØ£¿´ó¼Ò¸ø³ö¸öÖ÷Òâ¡£
ÒѾÓÐ46È˻ظ´
Ò»°ãEiÊÕ¼µÄÆÚ¿¯ÍâÉóר¼ÒÓм¸¸öѽ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò¸ø³ö¸öÖ÷Ò⣬ÈçºÎ¾Ü¾øµ¼Ê¦ÄØ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
lwiaanngg
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 46 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.773
- ½ð±Ò: 7403.2
- É¢½ð: 24
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 1211
- ÔÚÏß: 110.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 43541
- ×¢²á: 2004-04-10
- רҵ: Ó¦Óø߷Ö×Ó»¯Ñ§ÓëÎïÀí
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
liugsh1985(½ð±Ò+10): 2011-04-27 09:06:29
|
½¨ÒéÄãÕâÁ½ÌìÖØÐÂдһÏÂÂÛÎÄ£¬²»ÒªÓнÄÐÒµÄÐÄÀí£¬ËäȻʱ¼ä¶Ì£¬µ«²»ÄÜÖ»×ö¼òµ¥µÄ°áÒÆ¡£Èç¹ûʱ¼ä²»¹»£¬½¨ÒéÄ㻹ÊÇͶposter sectionÁË ±Ï¾¹±à¼ËµÁË¡°you would be not only breaking our rules and those of Elsevier who publish J Hydrology, but also academic ethos whereby you do not publish the same twice over¡±¡£ÕâÑùµÄÐÐÎªÉæ¼°µ½copyrightºÍplagiarismµÄÎÊÌâÁË¡£ |
3Â¥2011-04-27 08:14:00
visitor958
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
IEEEÔÓÖ¾Óë»áÒéר¼Ò
- Ó¦Öú: 2283 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.05
- ½ð±Ò: 17310
- É¢½ð: 2544
- ºì»¨: 76
- Ìû×Ó: 15735
- ÔÚÏß: 2926.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 489254
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-01
- רҵ: IEEE
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
liugsh1985(½ð±Ò+10): 2011-04-27 09:06:25
|
ÒÔǰµÄÑо¿¿ÉÒÔ×ܽá½éÉÜ£¬×÷Ϊ»áÒéÎÄÕ¡£µ«Ö÷ÒªÊÇÄãûÓÐÒýÓÃÄÇÆªÎÄÕ£¿ "you should cite the J Hydrology paper" µ«Í¼±êûÓб䣬Ҳ²»ÐС£¿ìµÀǸ£¬ËµÎÄÕÂÊÇ´ÒæÕûÀíµÄ£¬¿´¿´»áÒéÊÇ·ñ×·¾¿°É£¨Ó¦¸Ã²»»á£¬¡°I am sure you do not intend the latter¡±£©¡£¡£¡£ |
2Â¥2011-04-27 00:09:43
liugsh1985
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 921.8
- Ìû×Ó: 391
- ÔÚÏß: 60.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 635644
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-24
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ë®ÎÄ¡¢Ë®×ÊÔ´
4Â¥2011-04-27 09:18:25
visitor958
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
IEEEÔÓÖ¾Óë»áÒéר¼Ò
- Ó¦Öú: 2283 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.05
- ½ð±Ò: 17310
- É¢½ð: 2544
- ºì»¨: 76
- Ìû×Ó: 15735
- ÔÚÏß: 2926.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 489254
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-01
- רҵ: IEEE
5Â¥2011-04-27 10:21:47













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20