24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

cumtphdsunny

银虫 (小有名气)

SEPI: 1
应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.001
金币: 368.5
红花: 1
帖子: 114
在线: 98.6小时
虫号: 1250446
注册: 2011-03-30
专业: 煤地质学

[求助] 第一篇SCI审稿意见，请大家帮忙解读！

Dear Mr. xxx,

Your manuscript,has been reviewed. The comments are appended below. After reading the paper and the review/s, I must recommend rejecting the paper.

Both reviewers indicate that this is an interesting topic that could be considered for publication. And I agree with them. However, there are so many and so important issues that should be addressed in the manuscript, which are pointed out in detail in reviewers' reports and attachments, that a simple revision will not be enough to save it at this stage.

If you like to consider resubmitting this paper, please address all of reviewer comments in your revised paper and I can process it as a new submission. Should this be your choice, please include a response letter that shows how and where you addressed these comments as well, as it will make future review easier and faster.

I hope this does not discourage you from submitting papers to the International Journal of Coal Geology in the future.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有19人回复
职称评审没过，求安慰已经有53人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有5人回复
26申博自荐已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有4人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

请大家推荐一个审稿周期较快的SCI杂志，关于农业遥感方向已经有4人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB 已经有28人回复
大家讨论下国外的SCI期刊，外审的审稿周期吧已经有13人回复
请有经验的SCI审稿虫子帮忙已经有5人回复
刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见，看不懂，高手帮忙看一下~~ 已经有8人回复
SCI投稿审稿人意见是这样的怎么回复？已经有9人回复
第一次发SCI，麻烦高人帮我看看这条审稿意见如何回复已经有19人回复
第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰已经有304人回复
SCI文章审稿人意见回来，却不知如何答复，请各位前辈指点已经有7人回复
第一次投sci的审稿意见，小虫请教～已经有14人回复

1楼 2011-04-22 17:55:54

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

heattransfet

新虫 (职业作家)

应助: 51 (初中生)
贵宾: 0.146
金币: 7.8
散金: 3971
红花: 18
帖子: 3253
在线: 1514.4小时
虫号: 1051161
注册: 2010-07-03
性别: GG
专业: 绿色有机化学

【答案】应助回帖

cumtphdsunny(金币+1): 由与本人金币较少，一次奖励一个金币，分给回答问题的前十位虫友 2011-04-22 19:32:57
cumtphdsunny(金币+1): 每次奖励一个金币，分十次奖励前10位回答问题虫友 2011-04-22 19:34:49

引用回帖:

Originally posted by cumtphdsunny at 2011-04-22 17:55:54:
Dear Mr. xxx,

Your manuscript,has been reviewed. The comments are appended below. After reading the paper and the review/s, I must recommend rejecting the paper.

Both reviewers indicate th ...

修改后重投!!!!

需要大量的修改，编辑觉得要花很长时间