24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1161  |  回复: 4

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 请教一个审稿意见

Reviewer #2:
The authors have conscientiously tried to address the reviewer's comments and the final script is much improved. The manuscript is close to being in an acceptable form, but there remain some issues which should be addressed.

Of concern in the response to reviewer 1 is the statement that:When the ionic concentration of NaNO3 decreases from 1 M to 0.001 M, the ionic strength will decrease from 1 to 10-6, and 3-fold increase in activity coefficient should be reasonable. This statement is nonsense.  Ionic strength and concentration are the same for simple mono-valent salt. Single ion activity coefficients are unlikely to change by more than a factor of 10.



文章大修,两个审稿人都提出许多意见。回答后,第一个审稿人对我的回答没有意见。第二个审稿人对我回答他的问题也没有意见。可第二个审稿人却对我对第一个审稿人问题的回答不满意。是关于离子强度的问题,他认为,Ionic strength and concentration are the same for simple mono-valent salt.是这样吗?请指教!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ask_R

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

starared(金币+1): 2011-04-26 11:22:30
starared(金币+2): 2011-05-25 10:27:32
引用回帖:
Originally posted by starared at 2011-04-21 15:49:29:
Reviewer #2:
The authors have conscientiously tried to address the reviewer's comments and the final script is much improved. The manuscript is close to being in an acceptable form, but there rem ...

重点 这句“Single ion activity coefficients are unlikely to change by more than a factor of 10.”

你看看有没有文献支持你的opinion,有就可以了
梦想会实现
2楼2011-04-21 18:29:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jwfu

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

starared(金币+1): 2011-04-26 11:22:40
starared(金币+1): 2011-05-25 10:27:43
引用回帖:
Originally posted by starared at 2011-04-21 15:49:29:
Reviewer #2:
The authors have conscientiously tried to address the reviewer's comments and the final script is much improved. The manuscript is close to being in an acceptable form, but there rem ...

那说明,他又仔细看了你的所有回复修改
又来了灵感
那你继续修改~~~
某某某,有朝一日,一定要你跪下给我添脚~~~
3楼2011-04-21 18:31:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by starared at 2011-04-21 15:49:29:
Reviewer #2:
The authors have conscientiously tried to address the reviewer's comments and the final script is much improved. The manuscript is close to being in an acceptable form, but there rem ...

有物理化学专业的吗?请问稀溶液离子强度怎么计算?
4楼2011-04-21 21:30:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by jwfu at 2011-04-21 18:31:37:
那说明,他又仔细看了你的所有回复修改
又来了灵感
那你继续修改~~~

谢谢!文章已经接收.
5楼2011-04-27 19:38:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 starared 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生(3个名额)地质化工冶金领域 +57 AI8RaGaPaSCR 2026-08-07 60/3000 2026-08-14 04:45 by bxqFb8Dih2p1
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +10 家与远方 2026-08-10 15/750 2026-08-14 02:08 by 绵羊哥哥
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +11 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 29/1450 2026-08-14 00:04 by 大快人心啦
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +9 majunge000 2026-08-10 12/600 2026-08-13 23:20 by iwuli
[硕博家园] 一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗 +3 mbygzh 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-13 19:31 by 龙-樱
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
[基金申请] Filecode 又变了,巨变 +3 WH3796 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 14:13 by 小木虫6752397
[基金申请] 应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键 +22 Lanmanbaby 2026-08-09 36/1800 2026-08-12 22:50 by sdfapple719
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +3 yuleib84 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 21:53 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +3 lnee 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 18:10 by 希望我好好的
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 据悉今年马上要出结果了 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 12:42 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +9 布布和一二 2026-08-08 9/450 2026-08-10 11:22 by xxxx2020
[基金申请] 面上项目filecode邪修 +5 西山十月 2026-08-09 7/350 2026-08-10 07:32 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +5 布布和一二 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-09 16:15 by 袁向阳007
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
[基金申请] 国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率 +7 a089 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-08 18:05 by gltch
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
信息提示
请填处理意见