24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Drwater

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 631.1
帖子: 167
在线: 138.4小时
虫号: 767004

[交流] 高价悬赏投过Biosensors and Bioelectronics ，谢谢。

Biosensors and Bioelectronics 编辑报告看不懂，请求帮忙，谢谢。认真回答的大虾送5个币。

我投稿于Biosensors and Bioelectronics 上。现在三个审稿人都同意发表了，第一个审稿人需要一些修改。但是，在信件末尾有Editors' report：An "X" has been placed before the paragraph that you need to take into consideration. 这个到底是什么意思？好像是说有“X”的需要修改，但信件里没有出现“X”。那到底怎么办？
因为编辑报告的第三条，好像说是要我改成short communication，还有第五点要我重写摘要。。。。但是这些都没打X。您投这个杂志时是怎么样的？
请求帮忙，谢谢。（其实金币不是很重要，只是非常感谢您帮我解决问题，因为我第一次投稿，没有经验。所以最好请投过的大虾帮忙解决）.

以下是编辑给我的邮件：

Dear Prof.
We are pleased to inform you that your paper has been reviewed. We have considered all our referees' comments concerning your manuscript and have concluded that revision of the manuscript is required prior to publication.

In order to aid rapid processing you are required to provide a detailed letter containing responses specifically and clearly to each point raised in the referees' reports. For each point, please (a) list the referees questions; (b) indicate whether you agree or disagree with the referee; (c) describe what specific changes have been made in response to the points in the revised manuscript and in which pages; d) send us your revised paper in word with the changes in red.

You are reminded that delay in publication may occur if the instructions for preparing a revised paper are not strictly followed.

We will consider your paper withdrawn from our journal automatically if we do not hear from you on May 12, 2011.

In any future correspondence please quote the editorial office Ref. No. of your manuscript.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Thanks for your understanding and co-operation in advance.

The reviewers' and the editors' comments are appended below.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/ and login as an Author.

If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/automail_query.asp

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

For further assistance, please visit our customer support site at http://support.elsevier.com. Here you can search for solutions on a range of topics, find answers to frequently asked questions and learn more about EES via interactive tutorials. You should contact the supporter at authorsupport@elsevier.com should you need any further technical assistance

Reviewer #1: The authors demonstrated the use of graphene and Mal-Apy for the detection of concanavalin A. The idea is very interesting, and thus the manuscript could be published after some revision.
。。。。。

Reviewer #3: In the revised form, the paper can be accepted for publication

Editors' report:

An "X" has been placed before the paragraph that you need to take into consideration.

1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. Authors are expected to go beyond a simple compilation of references and analyse trends, shortcomings and accomplishments in their chosen field, charting possible future directions of the research. Illustrations and summary tables are encouraged. Flexibility of presentation is permitted, but authors are urged to arrange the subject matter clearly under the general headings of Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Main text (The heading and the sub-headings of the main text are left to author's discretion), Summary and Conclusions, Future Perspectives, Acknowledgements, References.

2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript is too long or comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. You could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/

3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication. It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words with up to three single figures/tables/schemes. Alternatively, you could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/

4. Most referees still prefer to read hard copy when they review your manuscript. In order to aid referees in printing you are strongly recommended to make your manuscript text compact and to check that it will print out in a convenient format.

5. Please rewrite the Abstract. In general, the abstract is a condensation of the information (facts) in the paper (150-250 words) and should present briefly and clearly the methods of the research and the principal results.

6. A maximum of six keywords should be given below the Abstract to describe the contents of the paper.

7. The Results and Discussion section needs to be expanded. The Results and Discussion should deals with the interpretation of the results in the light of previously published findings and must be clearly presented.

8. Please add the Conclusions section. It must be fully supported by the results reported and should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work.

9. Please rewrite the Conclusions.
9.1 The Conclusions section is too long. It should be kept short and must be fully supported by the results reported.
9.2 The Conclusions section is not sound. It should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work.

10. Please do not place a list of abbreviations in the text. Do not use an abbreviation without explaining it beforehand. The first time the word/phrase is introduced, put the abbreviation in brackets after the word/phrase.

11. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include Error Bars in figures, and relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in the figures captions or in the text.

12. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in Tables.

13. We strongly suggest you to find a native English speaker to check your manuscript.

14. Please number the headings and sub-headings of the manuscript.

15. The format of the paper is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/.

16. The format of references is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/. Please note it is not necessary to add the title of the publications in the list of references.

17. Please delete the title of the publications in the list of references.

18. In order for the publisher to edit your paper the article must be saved in the native format of the word processor used, e.g., Word Perfect, Microsoft Word, etc.

19. The preferred positions for all figures/tables/schemes should be indicated in the text. The figure captions should be provided on a separate sheet. Present figure captions, tables, schemes and figures in this order at the end of the article.

[ Last edited by Drwater on 2011-4-18 at 12:56 ]

回复此楼