| 查看: 1490 | 回复: 5 | |||
yinhailiang木虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
catalysis letter 拒稿后能申诉么？ 已有5人参与
|
|
向catalysis letter投一篇催化脱硫的稿件，审稿后主编给拒了，但是两个审稿人的意见都是修改后接收阿，这种情况下申诉有用么？各位有经验的专家给个建议吧。另外，主编参考审稿人的意见说我的稿子原创性不强，但是两位审稿专家都没有提出这样的问题啊，是不是主编搞错稿件了？ 从审稿人意见看的话，最大就是大修，意见都不尖锐。 Dear Dr. xxx: Enclosed please find the comments of the reviewers on your manuscript entitled "xxx". They both recommend against publication of the manuscript in its present form. They find that the originality is not sufficently strong for Catalysis Letters and that there are a a number of additional peices of work that need to be done to make this acceptable. I must uphold the judgment of the referees and decline the publication of the paper in Catalysis Letters at this time. With best regards, Prof. Andrew Gellman Catalysis Letters gellman@cmu.edu Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 1 Comments to the Author The paper describes synthesis and characterization xxx with the application in HDS and HDN. The paper is of good quality with respect to preparation and characterization of catalysts. However there are some concern and these are follows: 1) xxx. 2) It would be useful if authors measure the dispersion of metals using H2 chemisorption technique. It is well known that this technique can provide valuable information regarding the active site density. In addition, activity of two catalysts should be also determined in terms of turnover number. 3) In order to determine the exact coordination of molybdenum species, authors should characterized catalysts using diffuse reflectance UV–visible Spectroscopy. In conclusion, the manuscript can be published, if authors address above concerns in their revised manuscript. Referee: 2 Comments to the Author In this manuscript, author explored xxx. Authors’ work has exhibited sufficient contribution in this field to publish in Catalysis Letter. After some revision as following problems, the manuscript should be accepted. 1. In the introduction part, authors may display the important difference between xxx to emphasize the importance of this work. 2. If the preparation of xxx followed the literature, authors should cite the references. 3. To verify the structure of catalyst, authors have to provide the data of textural properties of xxx in table 2. 4. Author should also give the standard deviations of xxx. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有51人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿，申诉成功后今天戏剧接收
已经有231人回复
- Catalysis letters 未送审直接拒稿后如何改投
已经有14人回复
- Catalysis letters 未送审直接拒稿后如何改投
已经有9人回复
- 被拒了，想申诉呢，大家帮忙看看拒稿信，还有没有可能？
已经有13人回复
- catalysis communications拒稿，改投哪个期刊比较合适。时间越快越好，等着用他毕业
已经有8人回复
- 投稿Langmuir，审稿人都说可以发表，编辑拒稿，这种情况有必要申诉吗？
已经有10人回复
- 有这样冤的拒稿吗？申诉有效吗？？
已经有11人回复
- 投《稀有金属材料与工程》被拒稿，申诉，结果编辑说又送外审了，这是什么意思?
已经有7人回复
- 请教organic letter 如何申诉？
已经有7人回复
- Physica Scripta 拒稿,这种情形能否申诉呢?
已经有3人回复
statsky
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 35 (小学生)
- 金币: 4634.7
- 散金: 2415
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 782
- 在线: 627.8小时
- 虫号: 417924
- 注册: 2007-07-02
- 专业: 数学
2楼2011-04-15 08:33:12
lwiaanngg
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 46 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.773
- 金币: 7403.2
- 散金: 24
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1211
- 在线: 110.3小时
- 虫号: 43541
- 注册: 2004-04-10
- 专业: 应用高分子化学与物理
3楼2011-04-15 08:37:07
4楼2011-04-28 08:53:13
雨落潇湘梦
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 214.3
- 散金: 20
- 帖子: 13
- 在线: 17.7小时
- 虫号: 3688484
- 注册: 2015-02-14
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 化学工程及工业化学
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
前辈你好，我现在想投这个期刊，可是看格式方面要求比较简单，不知道格式该怎么调整，请问您那儿有模板吗？可以给我发一份吗？ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
5楼2017-06-06 10:17:11
15000610267
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4045
- 散金: 526
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1439
- 在线: 222.9小时
- 虫号: 4534662
- 注册: 2016-03-23
- 专业: 催化化学
6楼2018-05-26 11:43:36