应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 大家帮我看看，自己不确定什么意思。
51/1返回列表
查看: 2271  |  回复: 15
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chenlungang

铜虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 大家帮我看看，自己不确定什么意思。

第一次投稿，助编的意见，说修改后才送审，具体要修改啥，我也仔细看了，但不确定，求高手指点，尤其是做动力学的高手。我是搞催化的，这块不懂，什么术语的意思，麻烦解释下，抓重点说。谢谢了！
Dear Dr. Zhu:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. I understand that you have explored a novel way of treating the side stream from the Fischer Tropsch process. However, before I can send the manuscript out for review, I must ask you to revise it to address two issues that I am certain will concern the reviewers.

First, I must ask you to report the conversion data as reaction rates, normalized by the number of ostensible catalytic sites (i.e., turnover rates). Preferably, the kinetics results would be captured as rate equations in which the Arrhenius parameters (normalized pre-exponential factor, apparent activation energy) could be compare with those expected from the likely rate determining step and with those obtained in other laboratories. Hydrogen or CO titration are the usual ways of counting sites in catalysts where the active site is presumed to be a Pt group metal.

Second, especially because you have studied a liquid phase reaction, I must ask you to present evidence that the reaction rates have not been influenced by the rates of transport. A Koros-Nowak or Madon-Boudart test would suffice.

You will understand that I am striving to archive results that can be readily compared across laboratories and that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena.

I am formally rejecting this manuscript to give you the opportunity to make those changes or, if you prefer, to submit it to a journal with a less picky editor. However, I hope you will continue to consider that Energy & Fuels can provide your work with an attentive audience.

Therefore, when further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript so we can process it rapidly.
With sincere regards,
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2011-01-23 14:29:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

冰雪香香茄

银虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2011-01-23 17:43:02
Second, especially because you have studied a liquid phase reaction, I must ask you to present evidence that the reaction rates have not been influenced by the rates of transport. A Koros-Nowak or Ma ...

请求帮忙     我也遇到了  怎样做测试啊  有推荐的文献吗
赞一下 回复此楼
16楼2016-09-05 16:08:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

三工文武

木虫 (职业作家)
★
chenlungang(金币+1):谢谢参与
顶一下，祝楼主很快解决
回复此楼
4楼2011-01-23 17:19:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
★
chenlungang(金币+1):谢谢参与
Second, especially because you have studied a liquid phase reaction, I must ask you to present evidence that the reaction rates have not been influenced by the rates of transport. A Koros-Nowak or Madon-Boudart test would suffice.

2，特别是因为你已经研究了液相反应，我必须要求你提供证据证明反应速率没有收到传输速率的影响。做一个Koros-Nowak 或者Madon-Boudart测试就可以了。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
5楼2011-01-23 17:43:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lilei8610

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
★
chenlungang(金币+1):谢谢参与
帮顶吧！求高手解决！
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
6楼2011-01-23 18:16:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭