| 查看: 2853 | 回复: 15 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
[交流]
大家帮我看看，自己不确定什么意思。
|
||||
|
第一次投稿，助编的意见，说修改后才送审，具体要修改啥，我也仔细看了，但不确定，求高手指点，尤其是做动力学的高手。我是搞催化的，这块不懂，什么术语的意思，麻烦解释下，抓重点说。谢谢了！ Dear Dr. Zhu: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. I understand that you have explored a novel way of treating the side stream from the Fischer Tropsch process. However, before I can send the manuscript out for review, I must ask you to revise it to address two issues that I am certain will concern the reviewers. First, I must ask you to report the conversion data as reaction rates, normalized by the number of ostensible catalytic sites (i.e., turnover rates). Preferably, the kinetics results would be captured as rate equations in which the Arrhenius parameters (normalized pre-exponential factor, apparent activation energy) could be compare with those expected from the likely rate determining step and with those obtained in other laboratories. Hydrogen or CO titration are the usual ways of counting sites in catalysts where the active site is presumed to be a Pt group metal. Second, especially because you have studied a liquid phase reaction, I must ask you to present evidence that the reaction rates have not been influenced by the rates of transport. A Koros-Nowak or Madon-Boudart test would suffice. You will understand that I am striving to archive results that can be readily compared across laboratories and that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena. I am formally rejecting this manuscript to give you the opportunity to make those changes or, if you prefer, to submit it to a journal with a less picky editor. However, I hope you will continue to consider that Energy & Fuels can provide your work with an attentive audience. Therefore, when further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript so we can process it rapidly. With sincere regards, |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有4人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有18人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有21人回复
-
估计是周四
已经有4人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有9人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有18人回复
-
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有15人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有7人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有9人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有16人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 看到一个词，不知道什么意思，谁能帮我解释一下？
已经有6人回复
- 今天收到TTP公司的来信，不知道是什么意思，大家帮看一下！（投的EESD)
已经有9人回复
- 最近看到有文献里面说 HOMO+1, LUMO-1，不知道这个是什么意思？求解释。
已经有13人回复
- 大家帮我看看老板什么意思
已经有15人回复
- 大家帮我看一下，核磁，有几个峰搞的不是很清楚
已经有40人回复
- 帮我看看怎么回复导师邮件
已经有12人回复
- 【讨论】请大家帮我看看这个问号是啥意思
已经有21人回复
- 【请教】帮忙看下一个XPS光谱
已经有21人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见，需要大修，不知道希望大不
已经有4人回复
4楼2011-01-23 17:19:31
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.5小时
- 虫号: 971012
★
chenlungang(金币+1):谢谢参与
chenlungang(金币+1):谢谢参与
|
Second, especially because you have studied a liquid phase reaction, I must ask you to present evidence that the reaction rates have not been influenced by the rates of transport. A Koros-Nowak or Madon-Boudart test would suffice. 2，特别是因为你已经研究了液相反应，我必须要求你提供证据证明反应速率没有收到传输速率的影响。做一个Koros-Nowak 或者Madon-Boudart测试就可以了。 |
5楼2011-01-23 17:43:02
6楼2011-01-23 18:16:17
11楼2011-01-23 23:09:37
20