| 查看: 4392 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
有人投过CCC中国控制会议吗？
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
国自然申报交流祈福
+4/310
-
环境工程专业实习生|纯科研
+1/80
-
精细结构常数α=1/137的素数起源：论文投稿审核历程（A202604-1381）
+1/75
-
从137到p₃₃：精细结构常数的素数起源—86年未解之谜
+1/75
-
华南理工大学环境与能源学院液流电池博士招生
+1/60
-
山东大学齐鲁交通学院博士招生--压缩空气储能研究方向
+2/32
-
水处理技术员
+1/30
-
大湾区大学张国强课题组招聘光催化方向博士后
+1/26
-
北京航空航天大学化学学院郭林院士“非晶纳米材料”团队招收博士生
+1/24
-
大连理工大学张硕课题组2026年秋季博士生额外招生（补招1人，有机合成/糖化学方向）
+1/14
-
香港理工大学汪志勋课题组招收2026年9月入学全奖博士生一名
+1/14
-
坐标南京
+1/13
-
南京理工大学徐勃团队招收2026年9月份入学博士生（有机/纳米光电材料合成方向）
+1/8
-
招收2026年秋季入学博士生1名（河北工业大学/北京科技大学联合 增材制造/生物材料）
+1/7
-
中南大学地信院潘老师团队招收航天摄影测量与三维计算机视觉方向2026年入学博士生
+1/4
-
中山大学材料科学与工程学院周剑课题组2026年9月入学博士生招生需求
+1/3
-
2026年宁夏大学材料与新能源学院王海龙教授团队博士招生
+1/3
-
中国药科大学陈达威教授2026招收药理学学术型博士生一名(截止日期5月12日)
+1/2
-
土木工程--陆工大2026年第二批博士研究生补充招录
+2/2
-
综述投稿，we两个月
+1/1
66楼2011-01-20 09:17:52
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
