| 查看: 5420 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有14人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有5人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有17人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有15人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有5人回复
-
跳槽后在研项目怎么办？
已经有10人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有10人回复
-
今天放榜吗？
已经有16人回复
-
93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有26人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
散金祈福
+5/3965
-
面上第三年申请，改了一遍又一遍，希望能中啊！散金祈福！！！
+5/520
-
华西生物制药研究院招聘科研助理
+2/400
-
散金求好运
+1/190
-
诚征另一半
+1/170
-
Polymers 期刊特刊 组稿
+1/75
-
焦虑
+1/64
-
中山大学化学工程与技术学院欧阳钢锋/吴鑫课题组博士生（2027年入学）/博士后招聘启事
+1/32
-
坐标南京
+1/30
-
瑞典-博后-固态电池-粘结剂-锂离子电池方向
+1/25
-
上海大学王亮课题组诚招博士后（碳材料、光催化、电催化方向）
+2/20
-
***大叔找对象（沪深等地）
+1/20
-
北理工集成电路杰青团队 | 诚招科助理
+1/18
-
北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院杰青团队-招博士后
+1/17
-
上海交通大学化学化工学院倪伟焱课题组招收2027年申请考核制博士生（电催化+高分子）
+1/12
-
2027环境工程博士申请
+1/8
-
南方医科大学深圳医院陈烨/余涛教授课题组联合培养博士后招聘
+1/6
-
祈祷老公中国基
+1/4
-
新审查指南施行半年，AI方向的专利申请是不是更看"技术味"了？
+1/2
-
2026年国自然
+1/1
66楼2011-01-20 09:17:52
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
