| 查看: 4112 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
本人考085602 化学工程 专硕
已经有23人回复
-
求调剂院校信息
已经有4人回复
-
085600材料与化工306
已经有4人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
328求调剂，英语六级551，有科研经历
已经有9人回复
-
一志愿北京化工大学070300 学硕336求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
286分人工智能专业请求调剂愿意跨考！
已经有8人回复
-
资源与环境 调剂申请(333分)
已经有5人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
269专硕求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
- 自己的第一篇SCI，被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币，攒人品。100金币（已完结）
已经有159人回复
- 申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见返回，有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
- 收到修改意见，文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审，怎么办
已经有4人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰
已经有304人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
中国科学院杭州医学研究-常皓研究员课题组博士后招聘
+1/281
-
求购电镜上的液氮罐
+5/180
-
山东征女友，坐标济南
+1/163
-
福建师范大学叶应祥课题组招收2026级博士研究生
+2/158
-
香港中文大学（深圳）靳羽华教授交叉实验室高薪诚聘博士后（光致变色方向）
+2/158
-
祈福2026国基面上项目
+5/125
-
中山大学环境材料团队招聘
+1/85
-
天津理工大学国家杰青王铁课题组招收2026年博士研究生
+1/82
-
海南大学化工院生物质定向转化课题组招收博士/硕士，2026年9月入学
+1/81
-
中科院物理所二维材料方向招收推免研究生
+1/25
-
中南大学喻桂朋教授团队新增2026年博士研究生
+1/24
-
双一流湘潭大学化工学院招收化工、能源动力、工程热物理相关研究生调剂
+1/20
-
招聘科研助理——储能方向（储能、流体传热、CFD模拟）
+1/17
-
多伦多大学 & Synetic Labs 招博士后/研究员
+1/8
-
深圳信息职业大学招聘联合培养硕博研究生（急）
+1/7
-
湖北大学材料学招26级硕士研究生若干名
+1/6
-
【第三轮招生】澳科大诚招2026年秋季药剂学硕士研究生（3月31日下午18:00截止）
+1/5
-
MDPI下IJMS投稿 pending editor decision 9天
+1/3
-
深圳大学蔡兴科课题组博士后及研究助理招聘
+1/1
-
中科院上海微系统所材料生长理论与仿真课题组-博士后招聘（材料计算与AI4S）
+1/1
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
10楼2011-01-20 08:40:37
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
