| 查看: 4128 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见,散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊,我们专业的标杆性杂志,编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度?大家别光顾着拿金币,给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
08工科 320总分 求调剂
已经有9人回复
生物学071000 329分求调剂
已经有5人回复
306求调剂
已经有5人回复
284求调剂
已经有4人回复
寻找调剂
已经有4人回复
一志愿中南化学(0703)总分337求调剂
已经有10人回复
324求调剂
已经有6人回复
一志愿 西北大学 ,070300化学学硕,总分287,双非一本,求调剂。
已经有3人回复
289求调剂
已经有7人回复
319求调剂
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
自己的第一篇SCI,被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币,攒人品。100金币(已完结)
已经有159人回复
申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
投了一篇文章,审稿结果是“major revision”,帮忙看看评审意见,有戏没?
已经有32人回复
审稿意见返回,有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
收到修改意见,文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审,怎么办
已经有4人回复
一篇文章major revision后,审稿意见已经回来1周了,还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
第一篇SCI审稿意见回来,郁闷了,散点金币,求安慰
已经有304人回复
我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
青岛高校2026招生硕士研究生
+5/755
香港中文大学(深圳)靳羽华教授交叉实验室招募2026年材料学博士生(光致变色)
+2/150
香港中文大学(深圳)靳羽华教授交叉实验室高薪诚聘博士后(光致变色方向)
+2/146
材料、化学类硕士研究生调剂机会,学硕专硕均可,有意请联系,非诚勿扰!
+1/84
广东工业大学-木质纤维素高值化利用团队招博士研究生
+1/82
福建农林大学材料工程学院高分子材料课题组招生
+1/79
温州大学吕晶晶课题组2026年招生
+1/76
散金币,求基金中标!!
+1/61
河南工学院诚聘优秀凝聚态物理和电子科学与技术相关专业硕博研究生
+2/36
西安某大学能源化工新材料研发项目组接收2026级调剂研究生-计算机类
+1/32
春眠不觉晓
+1/24
中国民航飞行学院先进连接团队招收航空宇航、航空机械专业硕士研究生(学硕专硕均可)
+1/12
【2026考研调剂】南方科技大学-深圳理工大学联培 086000 免疫方向(26.9入学)
+1/9
北京航空航天大学招生微流控与智能打印技术方向博士研究生
+2/8
计算机(11408)考研361分求调剂
+1/8
【博士招生】武汉科技大学招收材料、化工、环境、冶金类2026年“申请-考核”制博士生
+1/7
福州大学国家级人才汤育欣教授课题组2026年招收”申请考核制“储能电池方向博士研究生
+1/6
青岛科技大学化工学院院士团队2026年拟招收全日制博士研究生1名
+1/6
MDPI下IJMS投稿 pending editor decision 9天
+1/3
2026考研的同学,分数不够?想调剂上岸的同学,来看
+1/2
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
10楼2011-01-20 08:40:37
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与















回复此楼
