| 查看: 4158 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料292调剂
已经有11人回复
-
269专硕求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
0703化学/290求调剂/本科经历丰富/工科也可
已经有8人回复
-
0856材料化工调剂 总分330
已经有7人回复
-
312求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
315调剂
已经有5人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料与化工考研调剂
已经有16人回复
-
299求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料求调剂
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
- 自己的第一篇SCI，被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币，攒人品。100金币（已完结）
已经有159人回复
- 申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见返回，有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
- 收到修改意见，文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审，怎么办
已经有4人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰
已经有304人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
湖北大学陈苗苗教授食品安全研究团队诚招博士生
+1/184
-
课题组接收化学、材料科学与工程、材料工程及化学工程专业硕士研究生
+1/183
-
福建师范大学叶应祥课题组招收2026级博士研究生
+2/122
-
南方医科大学中药学院 调剂硕士生一名 中药学专业
+1/84
-
材料、化学类硕士研究生调剂机会，学硕专硕均可，有意请联系，非诚勿扰！
+1/82
-
资源与环境专硕
+1/73
-
赣南师范大学智能制造与未来能源学院2026年硕士调剂信息
+1/47
-
广东唯一石化院校——资源与环境专硕招生
+1/43
-
青岛大学固态电池研究团队招收材料、化学、物理等方向博士研究生
+2/42
-
烟台大学精准材料高等研究院26年材料方向研究生招生
+1/33
-
双一流大学湘潭大学“化工过程模拟与强化”国家地方联合工程研究中心招收博士生
+1/14
-
【2026调剂】南方科技大学-深圳理工大学-中科院 联培086000免疫方向(26.9入学)
+1/11
-
西安工程大学环境与化学工程学院能源环境催化与先进材料课题组招生
+1/11
-
诚挚招生（硕士+博士）
+1/9
-
港科大（广州）招收光学传感器，集成电路设计，医学影像设备以及可穿戴设备方向的博士
+1/9
-
天津大学利物浦福州联合学院中外合办硕士【首批offer已发出】
+1/8
-
招收2026级研究生
+1/4
-
2026南京林业大学双一流建设高校——化学工程学院招收化学/材料相关专业硕士生
+1/4
-
英国剑桥好房出租
+1/3
-
上海师范大学有机化学专业研究生招生
+1/2
44楼2011-01-20 08:55:50
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
