| 查看: 5379 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
跳槽后在研项目怎么办？
已经有9人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有9人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有16人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有14人回复
-
今天放榜吗？
已经有16人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
- 自己的第一篇SCI，被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币，攒人品。100金币（已完结）
已经有159人回复
- 申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见返回，有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
- 收到修改意见，文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审，怎么办
已经有4人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰
已经有304人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
告别流水线爽文！108万字完结仙侠《女娲石之灵石奇缘（仙界篇）》值得细品
+1/9020
-
散金
+5/220
-
五大联赛看好哪支球队
+5/200
-
坐标北京诚征男友
+1/112
-
上海交通大学张航课题组招聘博士后（电化学储能）
+1/89
-
Polymers 期刊特刊 组稿
+1/76
-
焦虑
+1/65
-
上海交通大学张航课题组招聘博士后（电化学能量存储与转换）
+1/43
-
面上基金祈福
+1/42
-
强耀生物金秋开学季活动，2026年8月18日-10月31日，肽库筛选低至2W5
+3/40
-
瑞典-博后-固态电池-粘结剂-锂离子电池方向
+1/33
-
上海交通大学化学化工学院倪伟焱课题组招收2027年申请考核制博士生（电催化+高分子）
+1/12
-
pcold 原核表达载体
+1/9
-
2027环境工程博士申请
+1/8
-
南方医科大学深圳医院陈烨/余涛教授课题组联合培养博士后招聘
+1/6
-
南京大学 智能驱动与感知材料实验室 诚招申请考核博士生/科研助理/博士后
+1/4
-
出全新蔡司 Plan?APOCHROMAT 20×/0.8 平场复消色差物镜
+1/2
-
清华大学环境课题组招聘环境工作专业客座生研究生2-3名（应用导向）
+1/2
-
清华大学环境课题组招聘环境工作专业客座生研究生2-3名（应用导向）
+1/1
-
找女友
+1/1
34楼2011-01-20 08:53:11
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
