| 查看: 4121 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见,散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊,我们专业的标杆性杂志,编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度?大家别光顾着拿金币,给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
求调剂院校信息
已经有4人回复
085600材料与化工306
已经有4人回复
286求调剂
已经有10人回复
328求调剂,英语六级551,有科研经历
已经有9人回复
一志愿北京化工大学070300 学硕336求调剂
已经有4人回复
286分人工智能专业请求调剂愿意跨考!
已经有8人回复
资源与环境 调剂申请(333分)
已经有5人回复
280求调剂
已经有12人回复
269专硕求调剂
已经有5人回复
材料学硕301分求调剂
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
自己的第一篇SCI,被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币,攒人品。100金币(已完结)
已经有159人回复
申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
投了一篇文章,审稿结果是“major revision”,帮忙看看评审意见,有戏没?
已经有32人回复
审稿意见返回,有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
收到修改意见,文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审,怎么办
已经有4人回复
一篇文章major revision后,审稿意见已经回来1周了,还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
第一篇SCI审稿意见回来,郁闷了,散点金币,求安慰
已经有304人回复
我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
青岛高校2026招生硕士研究生
+5/770
2026年国基求好运!
+5/250
福建师范大学叶应祥课题组招收2026级博士研究生
+2/150
中国电气装备集团研究院招收AI+材料等相关岗位实习生
+1/88
海南大学化工院生物质定向转化课题组招收博士/硕士,2026年9月入学
+1/81
浙江大学侯阳教授团队诚聘博士后---高性能固态电解质与固态电池器件设计
+1/81
PBAT溶解做成乳液
+1/36
吲哚美辛原料药合成交流
+1/35
西安某大学能源化工新材料研发项目组接收2026级调剂研究生-计算机类
+1/32
中国科学院杭州医学研究所覃江江课题组招聘博士后
+1/30
海南师范大学孙元元老师招生博士,名额1~2个,2026年9月份入学(光电/光热催化方向)
+1/17
湖南大学微生物结构与功能实验室2026年计划招收博士研究生
+1/17
南京林业大学-国家级青年人才团队 招2026级博士、硕士(合成化学、植物化学方向)
+1/17
重庆文理学院化学与环境工程学院 2026 届硕士研究生调剂通知
+1/13
【2026考研调剂】南方科技大学-深圳理工大学联培 086000 免疫方向(26.9入学)
+1/10
深圳信息职业大学招聘联合培养硕博研究生(急)
+1/7
中国农科院兰州牧药所兽药创新与耐药性科研团队聘科研助理,急急急!
+1/5
招收调剂生 国家重点实验室(广西某师范大学、B区)
+1/3
MDPI下IJMS投稿 pending editor decision 9天
+1/3
西安交通大学生命学院智能化诊疗装备研究中心2026年博士生招生
+1/1
34楼2011-01-20 08:53:11
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与















回复此楼