| 查看: 4149 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0856材料专硕353求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料与化工085600，总分304，本科有两篇sci参与，求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
南昌大学材料专硕311分求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料与化工考研调剂
已经有12人回复
-
340求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
安徽大学专硕生物与医药专业(086000)324分，英语已过四六级，六级521，求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
292求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
085600材料与化工306
已经有10人回复
-
359求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
- 自己的第一篇SCI，被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币，攒人品。100金币（已完结）
已经有159人回复
- 申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见返回，有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
- 收到修改意见，文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审，怎么办
已经有4人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰
已经有304人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
温柔善良，重庆女孩，找男友……好像是乱码，内容在40楼看查看
+2/378
-
【强推｜可留校】济南大学博士后招聘（水利工程/铁锰碳环境过程）
+1/290
-
求助紫外可见分光光度计
+1/99
-
讲师身份申请面上项目中标率有影响吗
+1/77
-
招收材料相关硕士研究生
+2/42
-
中原食品实验室 & 郑州轻工业大学2026年硕士研究生联合培养调剂公告
+1/39
-
烟台大学精准材料高等研究院26年材料方向研究生招生
+1/33
-
【实战型】【生物医药】2026青岛大学招博士生 含少数民族骨干计划2名！
+1/15
-
西安工程大学环境与化学工程学院能源环境催化与先进材料课题组招生
+1/13
-
中南大学喻桂朋教授团队新增2026年博士研究生
+1/11
-
中国中医科学院中医药健康产业研究所（江西中医药健康产业研究院）2026年高层次人才等
+1/6
-
中国地质大学（武汉）清洁能源与资源循环团队诚招科研助理/2026级硕士、博士生/博士后
+1/5
-
墨尔本大学伯明翰大学联合全奖国际博士生
+1/5
-
天津工业大学双一流高校招博士、硕士、博士后
+1/4
-
寻找26博士生导师
+1/4
-
天津大学理学院分离分析及功能材料研究组招收硕士研究生
+1/4
-
085602调剂
+1/3
-
山东济南省属重点高校生态环境类硕士招生
+1/2
-
福建师范大学环境与资源学院招收2026级硕士生
+1/1
-
一志愿吉林大学药学专硕388分求调剂
+1/1
30楼2011-01-20 08:51:39
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
