| 查看: 4178 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料科学与工程求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿大连理工大学材料求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿北化085600材料专硕275|有文章专利｜求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料求调剂 一志愿哈工大总分298分，前三科223分
已经有8人回复
-
274求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
合肥区域性重点一本招收调剂
已经有4人回复
-
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有10人回复
-
22408 359分调剂
已经有7人回复
-
抱歉
已经有4人回复
-
085602化工求调剂（331分）
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
- 自己的第一篇SCI，被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币，攒人品。100金币（已完结）
已经有159人回复
- 申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见返回，有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
- 收到修改意见，文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审，怎么办
已经有4人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰
已经有304人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
南宁师范大学贺益苗课题组2026年招收有机化学和材料与化工专业拟招生4-5名硕士研究生
+1/183
-
中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所 招生2-3名联培生
+1/179
-
中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所张旭志课题组招聘 柔性传感器研究 科研助理
+2/130
-
青岛科技大学生物工程学院招调剂硕士研究生
+1/71
-
留学--博士招生
+1/50
-
广东唯一石化院校——资源与环境专硕招生
+1/42
-
考研调剂!
+1/41
-
大连工业大学 高分子材料 接收考研调剂
+1/39
-
济南大学水利与环境学院赵艳侠简介
+1/38
-
【分享】招收08工学硕士（要求过国家线）
+1/34
-
欢迎加入我们的团队！招博士 半导体光电子器件与集成
+1/17
-
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉
+1/12
-
西华大学材料学院表面科学与工程技术科研团队2026年招收研究生
+1/11
-
食品学硕考研调剂
+1/10
-
烟台大学先进陶瓷方向 招收材料专业调剂研究生
+1/9
-
武汉工程大学化学与环境工程学院 2026 年硕士研究生调剂公告
+1/9
-
江西科技师范大学 材料与能源招收调剂研究生
+1/7
-
江苏科技大学机械工程学院海洋装备仿生课题组招生简介
+1/4
-
澳门理工大学2026人工智能药物发现博士（奖学金+申请考核）
+1/3
-
调剂来这
+1/1
30楼2011-01-20 08:51:39
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
