| 查看: 5421 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有14人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有5人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有17人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有15人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有5人回复
-
跳槽后在研项目怎么办？
已经有10人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有10人回复
-
今天放榜吗？
已经有16人回复
-
93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有26人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
- 自己的第一篇SCI，被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币，攒人品。100金币（已完结）
已经有159人回复
- 申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见返回，有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
- 收到修改意见，文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审，怎么办
已经有4人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰
已经有304人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
基金祈福
+1/963
-
散金币
+1/929
-
南方医科大学|生物材料与医学工程团队诚聘科研助理
+2/248
-
基金申请小调查！预祝申请必定中中中！！祈福！！！
+5/245
-
五大联赛看好哪支球队
+5/175
-
坐标北京诚征男友
+1/112
-
美国University of Texas at Arlington土木结构工程方向2027年春季全奖博士招生
+1/86
-
中国药科大学博士，博后招聘（高分子，金属有机方向），欢迎大家交流推荐
+1/84
-
那年春暖花开，今朝如梦初醒 —— 北漂十五载，相亲十年，归乡孑然一身
+1/67
-
瑞典-博后-固态电池-粘结剂-锂离子电池方向
+1/36
-
中山大学化学工程与技术学院欧阳钢锋/吴鑫课题组博士生（2027年入学）/博士后招聘启事
+1/32
-
坐标南京
+1/30
-
瑞典-博后-固态电池-粘结剂-锂离子电池方向
+1/25
-
南京理工大学优青团队催化化学方向招收推免研究生
+1/22
-
上海大学王亮课题组诚招博士后（碳材料、光催化、电催化方向）
+2/20
-
***大叔找对象（沪深等地）
+1/20
-
北理工集成电路杰青团队 | 诚招科助理
+1/18
-
2027环境工程博士申请
+1/8
-
出全新蔡司 Plan?APOCHROMAT 20×/0.8 平场复消色差物镜
+1/2
-
清华大学环境课题组招聘环境工作专业客座生研究生2-3名（应用导向）
+1/1
25楼2011-01-20 08:48:33
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
