| 查看: 4160 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到审稿意见，散金币赞人品
|
|||
|
爱思维尔的期刊，我们专业的标杆性杂志，编辑给的是revise,不过审稿人感觉给的修改量还是不小的。大伙看看审稿人的态度？大家别光顾着拿金币，给点实际的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料与化工（0856）304求B区调剂
已经有6人回复
-
348求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
299求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
0856，材料与化工321分求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
085600，材料与化工321分，求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿华东理工大学081700，初试分数271
已经有7人回复
-
085601 材料工程 313分 求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
22408 359分调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 散金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 散金币,为自己的国基攒人品
已经有267人回复
- 自己的第一篇SCI，被Appl. Phys. lett接收。散金币，攒人品。100金币（已完结）
已经有159人回复
- 申请联培 今天收到第一个offer 但是不想去 散点金币攒人品
已经有186人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见返回，有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
- 收到修改意见，文章状态仍然是要求审稿专家评审，怎么办
已经有4人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来，郁闷了，散点金币，求安慰
已经有304人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
求助紫外可见分光光度计
+1/99
-
合肥工科211水利工程调剂招生
+1/66
-
欢迎环境科学与工程、水利工程专业研究生加入北师大珠海校区董越课题组
+2/56
-
长江师范学院 材料与化工专业 金磊老师课题组招收调剂学生
+1/47
-
欢迎化学、生物与医药、药学，生物、食品等相关专业的同学
+1/39
-
招收2名土木工程方向硕士研究生
+1/38
-
福建农林大学材料院招收调剂硕士生
+1/38
-
安徽工程大学化学与环境工程学院对外招收2026级调剂硕士研究生
+1/38
-
招收材料、化学类调剂生，专硕学硕均可
+1/33
-
天津理工大学国家杰青王铁团队招聘
+1/29
-
澳大利亚昆士兰大学化工学院招收全奖博士生2名
+1/26
-
三峡大学材料与化工学院调剂
+1/20
-
上海中医药大学创新中药研究院 招收审核制博士生一名
+1/17
-
博士招生 | 青岛科技大学（高分子、化学、材料、力学、航天、机电工程、计算机仿真）
+1/13
-
武汉工程大学资源生物技术课题组生物/环境/化工/矿冶专业硕士、博士研究生招生及调剂
+1/9
-
广东医科大学 李雪萌教授团队 招收申请考核制博士（临床检验诊断）
+1/7
-
山东济南省属重点高校，生态环境类硕士招生 调剂 信息
+1/6
-
各种IgG抗体表达系统
+1/3
-
2026南京林业大学双一流建设高校——化学工程学院招收化学/材料相关专业硕士生
+1/3
-
天津大学福州校区｜学长推荐上岸新思路
+1/1
★
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
 本帖仅楼主可见 |
20楼2011-01-20 08:46:08
2楼2011-01-20 08:27:34
3楼2011-01-20 08:32:44
5楼2011-01-20 08:35:05
简单回复
2011-01-20 08:37
回复
longzai(金币+1):谢谢参与
