| 查看: 1123 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
【求助】我文章的审稿意见中有这么一段话，把握不准，请大家给看看。
|
|||
|
Sample Text 我的审稿意见中有这么一段话 authors correctly report that all the efficient channels lie below reactant energies. It means that, according to the gas phase experiment carried out at relatively low pressure and with very high reaction coefficients, all these reactions take place at constant energy and angular momentum. Therefore many (I would say all) of the observed branching ratios plausibly derive from dynamical effects which may drastically deviate from the zero-kelvin (zero-momentum) conditions outlined by authors. Therefore they should report a brief comment about the actual (although not sever) limitations in the comparison of their results with the experimental ones. In other words I would be a bit more careful in describing the apparent discrepancy of PC-PE relative efficiency as a result of problems in the experiments....... 我大概的理解是要让我进行实验和计算条件的对比。 Therefore they should report a brief comment about the actual (although not sever) limitations in the comparison of their results with the experimental ones. 那这个部分 Therefore many (I would say all) of the observed branching ratios plausibly derive from dynamical effects which may drastically deviate from the zero-kelvin (zero-momentum) conditions outlined by authors. 是不是说我们提供的实验条件是在零开尔文（零动量），也就是绝对零度的条件下进行的。我的输出文件显示是在298.15k的条件下进行的。 而且是用了从头算和密度泛函两种方法算的。 理不清头绪，到底是想让我做什么？？？ 各位帮帮忙，好头疼。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
Tc数据拟合
已经有1人回复
-
韩国釜山大学储能电池与功能材料实验室诚招博后（电池/电化学/器件制备/MOF合成）
已经有187人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有141人回复
-
祈福！
已经有79人回复
-
散金求好运
已经有315人回复
-
博士生招生, 材料模拟方向，University of South Carolina
已经有0人回复
-
Postdoc position, materials simulations/machine learning, U. of South Carolina
已经有0人回复
-
祈福青基
已经有34人回复
-
香港中文大学（深圳）2026年招聘公告
已经有0人回复
-
牛来！米来！面来！
已经有8人回复
-
2027申博咨询
已经有11人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿人在前面写的一段话有没有必要回复呢？
已经有9人回复
- 我的文章出现了3个审稿专家，怎么回事勒～求助下
已经有15人回复
3楼2011-01-03 17:27:22
2楼2010-12-28 22:55:08
4楼2011-01-11 11:09:40
投票:
