24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1121  |  回复: 3

32587305

金虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 【求助】我文章的审稿意见中有这么一段话,把握不准,请大家给看看。

Sample Text
我的审稿意见中有这么一段话
authors correctly report that all the efficient channels lie below reactant energies. It means that, according to the gas phase experiment carried out at relatively low pressure and with very high reaction coefficients, all these reactions take place at constant energy and angular momentum. Therefore many (I would say all) of the observed branching ratios plausibly derive from dynamical effects which may drastically deviate from the zero-kelvin (zero-momentum) conditions outlined by authors. Therefore they should report a brief comment about the actual (although not sever) limitations in the comparison of their results with the experimental ones. In other words I would be a bit more careful in describing the apparent discrepancy of PC-PE relative efficiency as a result of problems in the experiments.......
我大概的理解是要让我进行实验和计算条件的对比。
Therefore they should report a brief comment about the actual (although not sever) limitations in the comparison of their results with the experimental ones.
那这个部分
Therefore many (I would say all) of the observed branching ratios plausibly derive from dynamical effects which may drastically deviate from the zero-kelvin (zero-momentum) conditions outlined by authors.
是不是说我们提供的实验条件是在零开尔文(零动量),也就是绝对零度的条件下进行的。我的输出文件显示是在298.15k的条件下进行的。
而且是用了从头算和密度泛函两种方法算的。
理不清头绪,到底是想让我做什么???
各位帮帮忙,好头疼。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

boylc789

木虫 (著名写手)


32587305(金币+2):我大致理解是这个意思,只是不知道零开尔文放在这里是什么意思。理论和实验都没有用到啊。 2010-12-29 11:22:11
32587305(金币+1): 2011-04-25 22:20:12
引用回帖:
Originally posted by 32587305 at 2010-12-28 18:15:43:
Sample Text
我的审稿意见中有这么一段话
authors correctly report that all the efficient channels lie below reactant energies. It means that, according to the gas phase ...

应该是让你做一个真实体系的和实验比较下
2楼2010-12-28 22:55:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

boylc789

木虫 (著名写手)


32587305(金币+5):谢谢,终于弄明白了。 2011-01-04 16:57:15
32587305(金币+1): 2011-04-25 22:20:19
引用回帖:
Originally posted by boylc789 at 2010-12-28 22:55:08:

应该是让你做一个真实体系的和实验比较下

电子能的计算是在0K下算的,做了freq才能得到热力学数据
3楼2011-01-03 17:27:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tiechong

金虫 (著名写手)


32587305(金币+1): 2011-04-25 22:20:23
看的好晕, 难道是在说零点能
4楼2011-01-11 11:09:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 32587305 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +15 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 17/850 2026-08-27 02:26 by xxniao123
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 LIbGuocjEEYw 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-27 02:01 by Ie9AyIAvGbvs
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +5 eulota 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 23:33 by young90
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +10 董八千 2026-08-26 10/500 2026-08-26 16:30 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +9 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-26 15:40 by semaglutide
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +22 羊腰板 2026-08-21 25/1250 2026-08-26 15:00 by zuocuiping
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +3 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 3/150 2026-08-25 10:35 by shisan1313
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +13 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 14/700 2026-08-25 09:10 by mrkang
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +13 kulium 2026-08-21 16/800 2026-08-24 16:27 by superceng
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 16/800 2026-08-24 10:23 by 太傻了
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
信息提示
请填处理意见