| 查看: 1120 | 回复: 3 | |||
[交流]
【求助】我文章的审稿意见中有这么一段话，把握不准，请大家给看看。
|
|
Sample Text 我的审稿意见中有这么一段话 authors correctly report that all the efficient channels lie below reactant energies. It means that, according to the gas phase experiment carried out at relatively low pressure and with very high reaction coefficients, all these reactions take place at constant energy and angular momentum. Therefore many (I would say all) of the observed branching ratios plausibly derive from dynamical effects which may drastically deviate from the zero-kelvin (zero-momentum) conditions outlined by authors. Therefore they should report a brief comment about the actual (although not sever) limitations in the comparison of their results with the experimental ones. In other words I would be a bit more careful in describing the apparent discrepancy of PC-PE relative efficiency as a result of problems in the experiments....... 我大概的理解是要让我进行实验和计算条件的对比。 Therefore they should report a brief comment about the actual (although not sever) limitations in the comparison of their results with the experimental ones. 那这个部分 Therefore many (I would say all) of the observed branching ratios plausibly derive from dynamical effects which may drastically deviate from the zero-kelvin (zero-momentum) conditions outlined by authors. 是不是说我们提供的实验条件是在零开尔文（零动量），也就是绝对零度的条件下进行的。我的输出文件显示是在298.15k的条件下进行的。 而且是用了从头算和密度泛函两种方法算的。 理不清头绪，到底是想让我做什么？？？ 各位帮帮忙，好头疼。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今年面上没有消息，想来是没了，散个金攒攒人品，为明年祈福
已经有698人回复
-
合肥工业大学854仪器技术综合专业课考研
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有262人回复
-
27年电化学博士毕业，想找海外QS前50的高校读博后求推荐
已经有3人回复
-
面上再次挂了，太难了，躺也躺不了，倦也卷不过，小学校之殇！
已经有37人回复
-
27年电池/材料类博士申请
已经有2人回复
-
2027年博士申请或转博科研助理 求推荐
已经有1人回复
-
氯化钠与有机磺酸分离
已经有1人回复
-
瑞典-博后-固态电池-粘结剂-锂离子电池方向
已经有53人回复
-
广东省面上有什么动态么，啥时候公布呀？
已经有1人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿人在前面写的一段话有没有必要回复呢？
已经有9人回复
- 我的文章出现了3个审稿专家，怎么回事勒～求助下
已经有15人回复
2楼2010-12-28 22:55:08
3楼2011-01-03 17:27:22
4楼2011-01-11 11:09:40
投票:
