| 查看: 4573 | 回复: 30 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
【求助/交流】中心法则
|
|||
| 随着表观生物学和非编码RNA的研究进展,许多人认为中心法则已经过时了,请谈一下你对此观点的看法。 |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有6人回复
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有6人回复
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有14人回复
求合成方法
已经有8人回复
师弟论文见刊大半年才想起来申请专利,还能抢救一下吗?
已经有4人回复
有机合成以后会不会被AI改变?做科研的虫友怎么看
已经有8人回复
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
求解:蛋白质不能用“表达”来描述,那应该用什么呢?
已经有8人回复
【资料】武汉大学分子遗传学笔记
已经有76人回复
【分享】〖名词解释〗生物化学名词解释
已经有14人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
坐标无锡,诚征女友
+3/967
2027年航天航空、材料与人工智能国际会议(AMAI 2027)
+1/873
2027年电气工程、自动化与应用工程国际会议(EEAE 2027)
+1/855
2027年生物医学、农业与可持续发展国际会议(BASD 2027)
+1/833
2027年计算机视觉、设计与非遗文化传播国际会议(CVDC 2027)
+1/807
持续创业者,A8离异男征婚,事业遇到瓶颈,寻找生活伴侣
+1/294
上海遇见缘分
+5/130
石河子大学能源与材料学院李航副教授课题组招收硕、博士
+1/98
石河子大学能源与材料学院李航副教授课题组招收硕、博士
+1/87
南科大薛亚辉课题组诚聘离子输运、二维材料、原子力显微镜等方向“快响行动”博士生
+1/87
南方科技大学力航系急招收纳米材料、力学、机械等方向推免硕士研究生两名
+1/80
澳门大学孙鹏展博士课题组招收全奖博士研究生1名
+2/74
【2027硕士招生】招收材料、化工、环境、冶金类硕士研究生
+1/28
废油资源化教育部工程中心 诚聘催化方向特聘研究员
+1/10
(香港大学)智能制造实验室招收27年春秋季入学全奖博士和硕士研究生
+1/10
大湾区大学姚瑶课题组2027届博士生招生 (与中山大学联合培养)
+1/6
澳门大学光电方向招收博士研究生
+1/5
从靶点发现到机制验证,肿瘤免疫治疗研究为什么离不开高质量抗体?
+1/1
CAR表达怎么测?定点荧光标记蛋白让流式细胞检测更直接
+1/1
中山大学中山医学院(深圳校区)-肿瘤细胞生物课题组招收联培(客座)硕士/博士生
+1/1
★
529802747(金币+1):谢谢参与
529802747(金币+1):谢谢参与
|
不就是DNA、RNA、蛋白质倒来倒去,这也称得上法则 central dogma就直接翻译成 中心,也太直接了 Use of the term "dogma" In his autobiography, What Mad Pursuit, Crick wrote about his choice of the word dogma and some of the problems it caused him: I called this idea the central dogma, for two reasons, I suspect. I had already used the obvious word hypothesis in the sequence hypothesis, and in addition I wanted to suggest that this new assumption was more central and more powerful. ... As it turned out, the use of the word dogma caused almost more trouble than it was worth.... Many years later Jacques Monod pointed out to me that I did not appear to understand the correct use of the word dogma, which is a belief that cannot be doubted. I did apprehend this in a vague sort of way but since I thought that all religious beliefs were without foundation, I used the word the way I myself thought about it, not as most of the world does, and simply applied it to a grand hypothesis that, however plausible, had little direct experimental support. Similarly, Horace Freeland Judson records in The Eighth Day of Creation: "My mind was, that a dogma was an idea for which there was no reasonable evidence. You see?!" And Crick gave a roar of delight. "I just didn't know what dogma meant. And I could just as well have called it the 'Central Hypothesis,' or — you know. Which is what I meant to say. Dogma was just a catch phrase." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_dogma_of_molecular_biology [ Last edited by 602059625 on 2010-12-30 at 19:07 ] |
23楼2010-12-30 18:55:00
2楼2010-12-21 15:11:43
3楼2010-12-21 15:19:37
4楼2010-12-21 15:27:17
简单回复
helmhlotz14楼
2010-12-21 19:17
回复
529802747(金币+1):谢谢参与











回复此楼