| 查看: 4645 | 回复: 30 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
【求助/交流】中心法则
|
|||
| 随着表观生物学和非编码RNA的研究进展，许多人认为中心法则已经过时了，请谈一下你对此观点的看法。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有13人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有6人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有11人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有4人回复
-
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有13人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求解：蛋白质不能用“表达”来描述，那应该用什么呢？
已经有8人回复
- 【资料】武汉大学分子遗传学笔记
已经有76人回复
- 【分享】〖名词解释〗生物化学名词解释
已经有14人回复
★
529802747(金币+1):谢谢参与
529802747(金币+1):谢谢参与
|
不就是DNA、RNA、蛋白质倒来倒去，这也称得上法则 central dogma就直接翻译成 中心，也太直接了  Use of the term "dogma" In his autobiography, What Mad Pursuit, Crick wrote about his choice of the word dogma and some of the problems it caused him: I called this idea the central dogma, for two reasons, I suspect. I had already used the obvious word hypothesis in the sequence hypothesis, and in addition I wanted to suggest that this new assumption was more central and more powerful. ... As it turned out, the use of the word dogma caused almost more trouble than it was worth.... Many years later Jacques Monod pointed out to me that I did not appear to understand the correct use of the word dogma, which is a belief that cannot be doubted. I did apprehend this in a vague sort of way but since I thought that all religious beliefs were without foundation, I used the word the way I myself thought about it, not as most of the world does, and simply applied it to a grand hypothesis that, however plausible, had little direct experimental support. Similarly, Horace Freeland Judson records in The Eighth Day of Creation: "My mind was, that a dogma was an idea for which there was no reasonable evidence. You see?!" And Crick gave a roar of delight. "I just didn't know what dogma meant. And I could just as well have called it the 'Central Hypothesis,' or — you know. Which is what I meant to say. Dogma was just a catch phrase." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_dogma_of_molecular_biology [ Last edited by 602059625 on 2010-12-30 at 19:07 ] |
23楼2010-12-30 18:55:00
2楼2010-12-21 15:11:43
3楼2010-12-21 15:19:37
4楼2010-12-21 15:27:17
简单回复
helmhlotz14楼
2010-12-21 19:17
回复
529802747(金币+1):谢谢参与
200