24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 5586  |  回复: 51

siyu2009-h

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 第一次投SCI,修改一次后被拒,该怎么办?急切!谢谢!已有47人参与

大家好!我是新人,真挚的谢谢每位回复的虫友。
       我第一次投SCI,投的是APPL OPTICS,以下是主编的回复,请问我应该改投还是认真修改之后还投这个杂志。再一次谢谢给我建议的虫友!
Dear Ms. ---:

Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics.

If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date.

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future.

Sincerely
----------------------------
Reviewer comments provided here:

Reviewer 1




Reviewer 2
Unfortunately, I feel that the authors have neither adequately addressed all of my own comments for mandatory amendments, or those of the other three reviewers. The paper itself is worthy of publication, but not in this form. It still requires a considerable amount of work to increase basic clarity. The problems of clarity of basic explanation are undoubtedly compounded by a poor quality of written English and language use throughout. Although the authors say in their response that they have tried to improve the English language, in reality the quality of the amended manuscript is little different to the original, and in some cases it is worse. Also, in the document supplied by the authors in response to the reviewer’s comments, several points have been addressed only within this document, i.e. directly to the reviewers, rather than having been addressed in the paper by amending the manuscript itself. Therefore, I conclude that without a further round of amendments, which is not allowed under the AO refereeing guidelines, the quality of the paper is not sufficiently high to merit publication in AO and I must therefore recommend rejection of the paper. Should the authors wish to re-submit afresh, I would recommend getting somebody else to look at the written language and to improve clarity. The technical material is worthy of publication, but the paper must be improved.
----------------------------
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlzalft

木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
让你重投了,还有机会,认真修改吧
2楼2010-11-21 16:17:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

smurfen

至尊木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
大修被拒,lz rp不好啊
Advances in Prevention of Thermal Runaway in Lithium-Ion Batteries
3楼2010-11-21 16:17:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

主要是语言问题,找牛人帮助修改吧


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
主要是语言问题,找牛人帮助修改吧
本文来自: 小木虫论坛 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2617839&fpage=1
4楼2010-11-21 16:23:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fangxingbaixue

木虫 (知名作家)

gxgm111


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
还是给LZ机会了,好好改,祝福~~~
love my guamei forever
5楼2010-11-21 16:33:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wezzyl

金虫 (正式写手)

改投其他。
6楼2010-11-21 16:55:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
修改后再投,属于大大修,祝福楼主!
咱也是有组织的人了...
7楼2010-11-21 17:06:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liyuanZ

捐助贵宾 (知名作家)

环能虫


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
楼主觉得自己有理,就抗辩。EASY
领悟-提高
8楼2010-11-21 17:18:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiaoxg

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

修改后重投


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
有希望,但必须认真修改!
9楼2010-11-21 17:19:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lwrobinson

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
如果是要赶着投文章,比较一下看哪家发表的速度快些,比如letter、express之类的会快不少,但是最好按照这次的几个审稿人修改意见修改后再投。
10楼2010-11-21 17:25:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 siyu2009-h 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见