| 查看: 6805 | 回复: 51 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
siyu2009-h铜虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
第一次投SCI，修改一次后被拒，该怎么办？急切！谢谢！ 已有47人参与
|
|||
|
大家好！我是新人，真挚的谢谢每位回复的虫友。 我第一次投SCI,投的是APPL ＯＰＴＩＣＳ，以下是主编的回复，请问我应该改投还是认真修改之后还投这个杂志。再一次谢谢给我建议的虫友！ Dear Ms. －－－: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely   ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Unfortunately, I feel that the authors have neither adequately addressed all of my own comments for mandatory amendments, or those of the other three reviewers. The paper itself is worthy of publication, but not in this form. It still requires a considerable amount of work to increase basic clarity. The problems of clarity of basic explanation are undoubtedly compounded by a poor quality of written English and language use throughout. Although the authors say in their response that they have tried to improve the English language, in reality the quality of the amended manuscript is little different to the original, and in some cases it is worse. Also, in the document supplied by the authors in response to the reviewer’s comments, several points have been addressed only within this document, i.e. directly to the reviewers, rather than having been addressed in the paper by amending the manuscript itself. Therefore, I conclude that without a further round of amendments, which is not allowed under the AO refereeing guidelines, the quality of the paper is not sufficiently high to merit publication in AO and I must therefore recommend rejection of the paper. Should the authors wish to re-submit afresh, I would recommend getting somebody else to look at the written language and to improve clarity. The technical material is worthy of publication, but the paper must be improved. ---------------------------- |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 百宝箱 |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 第一次投SCI，要求minor revise，请问revise的格式是什么？
已经有6人回复
- 第一次投SCI遇到了一些问题，希望大家能给予帮助，谢谢了。
已经有6人回复
- 第一次投SCI，直接被拒
已经有13人回复
- 第一次投SCI，杂志社回信
已经有13人回复
- 编辑如此回复是何意呢？谢谢，第一次投sci
已经有19人回复
- 第一次投SCI被拒了，很难过很神伤
已经有35人回复
- SCI文章审稿人意见回来，却不知如何答复，请各位前辈指点
已经有7人回复
- 第一次投sci的审稿意见，小虫请教～
已经有14人回复
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
7楼2010-11-21 17:06:21
2楼2010-11-21 16:17:13
smurfen
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 20976.6
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 2644
- 在线: 151.8小时
- 虫号: 340110
- 注册: 2007-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 微生物遗传育种学
3楼2010-11-21 16:17:40
starared
禁虫 (著名写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 6080.8
- 散金: 172
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1825
- 在线: 762.4小时
- 虫号: 1137379
- 注册: 2010-11-02
- 专业: 样品前处理方法与技术
主要是语言问题,找牛人帮助修改吧
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
主要是语言问题,找牛人帮助修改吧 本文来自: 小木虫论坛 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2617839&fpage=1 |
4楼2010-11-21 16:23:00
