| 查看: 1752 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
doha木虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
Surface & Coatings Technology 小修还是大修？？？？已有1人参与
|
||
|
6月底投了一篇Surface & Coatings Technology ，前几天刚刚回复了结果，如下。 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. You are expected to return your Revision by 20 Dec 2010. Allan Matthews Editor Surface and Coatings Technology ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Is the subject matter suitable for publication in SURFACE AND COATINGS TECHNOLOGY? Yes, once the corrections/clarifications are made. 2. What technological problems are addressed in the paper? Oxidation control in steel . 3. Is the paper acceptable in its present form? with minor revision? ??????????????? 4. Is it a new and original contribution? Yes 5. Does it contain material that might well be omitted? If so, what? No 6. Is it clearly presented and well organized? See comments above. 7. Does it give adequate references related to work? Yes 8. Is the English satisfactory? No, corrections need to be made. 9. Are the illustrations and tables all necessary and adequate? Yes 10. Is the summary adequate and informative? Yes 11. Are the conclusions sound and justified? 12. Please list further comments or specific suggestions below: I found that the work was interesting and potentially useful to ********. In general, the manuscript suffers from a number of typographical/grammatical errors which need to be corrected. I have indicated these in red on the scanned manuscript. Specifically, at the top of page 7, mention is made of a particle size distribution in the slurry, but no specific numbers are given. The manuscript would benefit by their inclusion. Equation 1 on page 6 needs a reference. Finally, more details need to be provided on page 9 when talking about the formation of ***** ------------------------------------------------ 审稿人真的很好，直接给的扫描版，上面把一些语法的错误都标出来还帮忙改了。 审稿人给了一个"minor revision?", 而投稿页面显示的却是"major revision", 好像审稿人挺感兴趣的，而主编的兴趣却没那么大。 现向有经验的虫友求助，难道真的要大修吗？？？这篇文章接受的概率大不大？ 希望虫友们多多指点，这篇文章关系着洒家的毕业大计啊 [ Last edited by doha on 2010-9-25 at 17:56 ] 昨天 Allan Matthews 发来邮件，经过小修后文章接受了，哈哈。 真的像虫友们说的那样，认真修改，肯定接受 [ Last edited by doha on 2010-12-22 at 11:14 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
初始合伙人来啦！（生物试剂耗材标准品）
已经有15人回复
-
F口信息学部拿面上，大概需要什么样的成果
已经有5人回复
-
这个博士要读吗
已经有9人回复
-
车间生产，真空度很高，温度很高，但减压蒸馏速度很慢。
已经有37人回复
-
我标书代码变了
已经有29人回复
-
最新消息：2024国自然下载文件名变了
已经有12人回复
-
硕博巨婴，也许才刚刚开始
已经有77人回复
-
应届大龄土博教职选择，石河子大学和广西大学
已经有34人回复
-
江西双非一本和四川双一流高校如何选择？
已经有25人回复
-
博士毕业高校和就业的相关问题
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 一年后收到初审意见没标明大修还是小修
已经有9人回复
- 紧急求助:Energy srouces 一次大修，一次小修后拒稿，能够给主编写信说明情况
已经有20人回复
- 小修变大修后，希望如何？
已经有15人回复
- 大家帮忙分析一下
已经有3人回复
- 我的第一SCI投稿返回意见了，这个算大修还是小修？ Physica A
已经有11人回复
- PRB这样的审稿意见算是大修还是小修？
已经有6人回复
- CC投稿被仲裁，如何写response letter
已经有6人回复
- 求助关于Surface and coatings technology
已经有8人回复
- 小修或者大修一般多久给消息？
已经有6人回复
- Interim Decision
已经有19人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- 关于编辑的问题
已经有8人回复
2楼2010-09-25 17:19:22
10