24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3143  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hk0320051

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 帮忙看一下Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology的回复 已有6人参与

我四月中旬在 Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology上投了一篇QSAR(quantitative structure-activity relationship)类的文章,今天给了我回复:

Your manuscript is judged to be a Negotiable Rejection. This means that the reviewers and the editors believe your manuscript can be revised to make it acceptable scientifically as opposed to rejecting it outright. You must incorporate the reviewer suggestions and you must provide a list of the revisions made and a list of rebuttal comments, if any.

This classification requires very careful thought about your revisions. Each suggested revision must be incorporated or rebutted. Failure to revise appropriately will result in rejection.
是拒绝了吗?
是否还有回旋的余地?
下面是意见(不是很明白写的是什么意思):

COMMENTS TO AUTHOR:

This is a nice approach, but of what use is it?  GLC retention time prediction has been around for 50 years.  If the experimenter knows they are analyzing only PAHs then this works, but if they are faced witha variety of compounds then of what use is this model??

There is an additional problem with the variety of columns on the market for GLC.  Which of these columns is different enough from the column used that this model would not work?

The authors need to rethink the reasons for doing this study and its usefulness in the big world of science.  If they think they can justify the study based on these questions then it will be reviewed again.

Revise and rereview.





EDITORIAL REQUIREMENTS

Yes  No  N/A

()      ()      ()  Manuscript Length is Appropriate
()      ()      ()  Manuscript Prepared According to Instructions
()      ()      ()    Clearly written with proper English grammar and syntax.
()      ()      ()    Introductory paragraphs are concise and  appropriate
()      ()      ()  References cited to current studies in introduction.
()      ()      ()    There is a clear purpose & hypothesis for the study.
()      ()      ()    Sampling is described.
()      ()      ()    Methods & Materials section is detailed so that the study could be repeated.
()      ()      ()    Analytical methods are described or provided by readily available reference(s).
()      ()      ()    Limits of detection are reported.
()      ()      ()    Fortified sample recoveries are reported.
()      ()      ()    Statistics are appropriate and are referenced in the Materials & Methods section.
()      ()      ()    Data are compared to other studies.
()      ()      ()    References are current and appropriate
()      ()      ()  Significance of findings are described.

TECHNICAL MERIT

Check one rank in each category
      1 = poor, 5 = excellent

1  2  3  4  5                          
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Clarity                     
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Technical Quality        
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Originality                    
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Novelty.
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Data interpretation is appropriate.
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Scientific value


SIGNIFICANCE
()  None
()  Local
()  National
()  Regional
()  Global
---
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

疏影暗光水

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by lrruily at 2014-06-23 15:15:18
请问一下这个期刊怎么提交修订稿?

你好,请问您现在知道怎么提交吗?我同问,急需!如果您知道,麻烦告诉我一下呢?谢谢!
10楼2017-06-28 20:32:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

zhaors1976

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
对于这个期刊按照专家的意见去改就可以,我的一位师兄在这上面投过
一篇论文,评审专家的意见很明白:拒稿(至少我们实验室的人都这样认为),
但他按照专家的意见改了以后就接受了,有点怪.
本人在上面发过两篇,IF大约0.5左右.
祝好运!
2楼2010-09-25 16:53:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
4楼2010-09-26 06:12:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lrruily

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问一下这个期刊怎么提交修订稿?
7楼2014-06-23 15:15:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +16 羊腰板 2026-08-21 17/850 2026-08-23 23:02 by tianxiaochun
[教师之家] 跳槽后在研项目怎么办? +5 简单化xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by 简单化xn
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +9 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 10/500 2026-08-23 12:03 by 丶昵称占用
[基金申请] 93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写 +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-17 8/400 2026-08-22 21:55 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +3 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 4/200 2026-08-22 20:02 by mycsru
[基金申请] 只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫 +24 yaoyewhu2008 2026-08-20 26/1300 2026-08-22 17:43 by kammury
[基金申请] filecode,4个jtjc了 +13 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 16/800 2026-08-22 17:08 by WH3796
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +8 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-22 16:30 by zyqchem
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 40+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 14/700 2026-08-21 23:51 by cratir
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +16 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 20/1000 2026-08-21 21:13 by Ldrop2023
[基金申请] 科研孤儿太难了 +17 我4大白菜 2026-08-20 18/900 2026-08-21 20:57 by zhangev
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 8/400 2026-08-21 12:31 by 酷酷墨镜
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +6 wangzilk 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-19 10:55 by Haru815
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
信息提示
请填处理意见