24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2470  |  回复: 13

hk0320051

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 帮忙看一下Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology的回复已有6人参与

我四月中旬在 Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology上投了一篇QSAR(quantitative structure-activity relationship)类的文章,今天给了我回复:

Your manuscript is judged to be a Negotiable Rejection. This means that the reviewers and the editors believe your manuscript can be revised to make it acceptable scientifically as opposed to rejecting it outright. You must incorporate the reviewer suggestions and you must provide a list of the revisions made and a list of rebuttal comments, if any.

This classification requires very careful thought about your revisions. Each suggested revision must be incorporated or rebutted. Failure to revise appropriately will result in rejection.
是拒绝了吗?
是否还有回旋的余地?
下面是意见(不是很明白写的是什么意思):

COMMENTS TO AUTHOR:

This is a nice approach, but of what use is it?  GLC retention time prediction has been around for 50 years.  If the experimenter knows they are analyzing only PAHs then this works, but if they are faced witha variety of compounds then of what use is this model??

There is an additional problem with the variety of columns on the market for GLC.  Which of these columns is different enough from the column used that this model would not work?

The authors need to rethink the reasons for doing this study and its usefulness in the big world of science.  If they think they can justify the study based on these questions then it will be reviewed again.

Revise and rereview.





EDITORIAL REQUIREMENTS

Yes  No  N/A

()      ()      ()  Manuscript Length is Appropriate
()      ()      ()  Manuscript Prepared According to Instructions
()      ()      ()    Clearly written with proper English grammar and syntax.
()      ()      ()    Introductory paragraphs are concise and  appropriate
()      ()      ()  References cited to current studies in introduction.
()      ()      ()    There is a clear purpose & hypothesis for the study.
()      ()      ()    Sampling is described.
()      ()      ()    Methods & Materials section is detailed so that the study could be repeated.
()      ()      ()    Analytical methods are described or provided by readily available reference(s).
()      ()      ()    Limits of detection are reported.
()      ()      ()    Fortified sample recoveries are reported.
()      ()      ()    Statistics are appropriate and are referenced in the Materials & Methods section.
()      ()      ()    Data are compared to other studies.
()      ()      ()    References are current and appropriate
()      ()      ()  Significance of findings are described.

TECHNICAL MERIT

Check one rank in each category
      1 = poor, 5 = excellent

1  2  3  4  5                          
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Clarity                     
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Technical Quality        
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Originality                    
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Novelty.
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Data interpretation is appropriate.
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Scientific value


SIGNIFICANCE
()  None
()  Local
()  National
()  Regional
()  Global
---
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

lrruily

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问一下这个期刊怎么提交修订稿?
7楼2014-06-23 15:15:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaors1976

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
对于这个期刊按照专家的意见去改就可以,我的一位师兄在这上面投过
一篇论文,评审专家的意见很明白:拒稿(至少我们实验室的人都这样认为),
但他按照专家的意见改了以后就接受了,有点怪.
本人在上面发过两篇,IF大约0.5左右.
祝好运!
2楼2010-09-25 16:53:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
3楼2010-09-26 04:02:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
4楼2010-09-26 06:12:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liujunhero

新虫 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献文献杰出贡献


hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
祝福顺利啊
5楼2010-09-26 07:27:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jwfu

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
祝福顺利接受
某某某,有朝一日,一定要你跪下给我添脚~~~
6楼2010-09-26 08:03:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hanguichun

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by lrruily at 2014-06-23 15:15:18
请问一下这个期刊怎么提交修订稿?

同问
8楼2014-12-23 20:13:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

蓝木棋子

金虫 (小有名气)

公主


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by zhaors1976 at 2010-09-25 16:53:00
对于这个期刊按照专家的意见去改就可以,我的一位师兄在这上面投过
一篇论文,评审专家的意见很明白:拒稿(至少我们实验室的人都这样认为),
但他按照专家的意见改了以后就接受了,有点怪.
本人在上面发过两篇,IF大约 ...

请问这个返修上传的的“Complete Manuscript (text, tables, and figures)”在文中有标记哪些是修改的了么?还是把修改好的文章直接上传,不用把修改的标记出来啊?
Have courage and be kind.
9楼2015-01-13 20:06:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

疏影暗光水

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by lrruily at 2014-06-23 15:15:18
请问一下这个期刊怎么提交修订稿?

你好,请问您现在知道怎么提交吗?我同问,急需!如果您知道,麻烦告诉我一下呢?谢谢!
10楼2017-06-28 20:32:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 hk0320051 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见