24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2018  |  回复: 21

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] JAP被拒,还有修改重投的必要吗? 已有12人参与

审稿人的意见如下:

Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Reject
Sufficient New Physics in an Applied Area: No
Appropriate Length: Yes
Well Organized and Clearly Written: Yes
Good Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: No
Adequate References: Yes
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal
PRESENTATION RATING: Good

Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author):

This reviewer believes the submitted manuscript is not suitable for
publication in JAP for the following reasons.

1) Many of the structures studied in the manuscript are of size scale
comparable to wavelength and thus geometric optics based approach
such as ray tracing is fundamentally flawed.

2) Some ray tracing programs indeed incorporate diffraction but the purpose
is mostly to provide a correction to geometric optics and its valid for periodic
nanoscructures really needs to be verified. There is no such verification
effort in the manuscript.

3) For larger microstructures where geometric optics is valid, JAP
is not a suitable journal for geometric optical design issues.

The following comments might help redirect the research and
future submissions.

It would be a nice project to calibrate the transmission/reflection
model of a ray tracing (RT) program against more advanced
approach such as FDTD for a flat LED surface with nanostructure.
Then, the RT would be a suitable tool to study
extraction characteristics such as 3D angular distribution of
nanostructured LED. Such results would make a nice submission to
JAP or an engineering oriented journal.

大家看看还有修改重投的必要吗?还是改投呢?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

随心所欲顺其自然
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

polestar007

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
首先,被拒了就不要想着重投,除非你有新的重大发现

其次,有明确说明”not suitable for publication in JAP“
匏土革,木石金。丝与竹,乃八音。
2楼2010-08-14 10:15:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by polestar007 at 2010-08-14 10:15:36:
首先,被拒了就不要想着重投,除非你有新的重大发现

其次,有明确说明”not suitable for publication in JAP“

嗯,主要是看审稿人其他指标的评价还不错!
随心所欲顺其自然
3楼2010-08-14 10:24:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

felicity6056

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
改投吧,何苦浪费自己的时间涅
努力的过程讲究方法!
4楼2010-08-14 10:26:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

polestar007

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by jhzhuwanglj at 2010-08-14 10:24:58:

嗯,主要是看审稿人其他指标的评价还不错!

哪有不错啊,TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal

这一个就要了命了!再加上图片!

其他那些明显的无关紧要!


再说后面的几个问题,档次一下就下来了
匏土革,木石金。丝与竹,乃八音。
5楼2010-08-14 10:29:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by polestar007 at 2010-08-14 10:29:15:



哪有不错啊,TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal

这一个就要了命了!再加上图片!

其他那些明显的无关紧要!


再说后面的几个问题,档次一下就下来了

那好吧,那还是改投吧,其实一直不是很明白那个marginal什么意思
随心所欲顺其自然
6楼2010-08-14 10:34:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by felicity6056 at 2010-08-14 10:26:16:
改投吧,何苦浪费自己的时间涅

嗯,那还是改投吧!
随心所欲顺其自然
7楼2010-08-14 10:34:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

polestar007

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by jhzhuwanglj at 2010-08-14 10:34:12:


那好吧,那还是改投吧,其实一直不是很明白那个marginal什么意思

1. (印或记)在页边的2. 不重要的, 微小的, 少量的3. 仅以微弱多数票获胜的4. 非主体的;边缘的 5. 贫瘠的(因而盈利有限)
匏土革,木石金。丝与竹,乃八音。
8楼2010-08-14 10:35:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuying_hero

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

互助小英哥


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
按照审稿人给提的意见,好好修改下,然后找个别的杂志再投吧!这个杂志估计是不行了!
Kelly
9楼2010-08-14 10:49:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by liuying_hero at 2010-08-14 10:49:25:
按照审稿人给提的意见,好好修改下,然后找个别的杂志再投吧!这个杂志估计是不行了!

嗯,谢谢!
随心所欲顺其自然
10楼2010-08-14 11:00:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jhzhuwanglj 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见