24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 318.6
帖子: 263
在线: 31.5小时
虫号: 964383
注册: 2010-03-08
性别: MM
专业: 半导体

[交流] JAP被拒，还有修改重投的必要吗？已有12人参与

审稿人的意见如下：

Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Reject
Sufficient New Physics in an Applied Area: No
Appropriate Length: Yes
Well Organized and Clearly Written: Yes
Good Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: No
Adequate References: Yes
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal
PRESENTATION RATING: Good

Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author):

This reviewer believes the submitted manuscript is not suitable for
publication in JAP for the following reasons.

1) Many of the structures studied in the manuscript are of size scale
comparable to wavelength and thus geometric optics based approach
such as ray tracing is fundamentally flawed.

2) Some ray tracing programs indeed incorporate diffraction but the purpose
is mostly to provide a correction to geometric optics and its valid for periodic
nanoscructures really needs to be verified. There is no such verification
effort in the manuscript.

3) For larger microstructures where geometric optics is valid, JAP
is not a suitable journal for geometric optical design issues.

The following comments might help redirect the research and
future submissions.

It would be a nice project to calibrate the transmission/reflection
model of a ray tracing (RT) program against more advanced
approach such as FDTD for a flat LED surface with nanostructure.
Then, the RT would be a suitable tool to study
extraction characteristics such as 3D angular distribution of
nanostructured LED. Such results would make a nice submission to
JAP or an engineering oriented journal.

大家看看还有修改重投的必要吗？还是改投呢？

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

计算机、0854电子信息（085401-058412）调剂已经有4人回复
基金申报已经有3人回复
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？已经有9人回复
溴的反应液脱色已经有6人回复
纳米粒子粒径的测量已经有7人回复
常年博士招收(双一流，工科) 已经有4人回复
推荐一本书已经有10人回复
参与限项已经有5人回复
有没有人能给点建议已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求已经有12人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

有没有虫子投过计算机学报？看看计算机学报给我的审稿意见，我还有必要修改吗？已经有12人回复
JAFC投稿求助，一投被拒，想重投~ 已经有17人回复
论文被拒了。。两天后，编辑又来信，让重新修改，然后再以信文章投稿。。已经有36人回复
sci 被拒后，大修改后重投这个杂志有戏吗？已经有35人回复
angewandte chemie international edition 被拒修改后重投问题已经有9人回复
被Talanta拒了，是修改后重投，还是改投呢已经有11人回复
论文被拒，但编辑说按审稿人的意见修改后再重新提交还是有可能会接受已经有25人回复
因为语言等细节问题被拒稿，修改后重投给原来的杂志收的可能性大么？已经有9人回复
第一次投稿被拒了，大家帮我看看还有没有希望修改后重投。谢谢！！！！！已经有10人回复
请问大家，投稿被拒后，能不能修改后再重新投！已经有10人回复
European polymer journal被拒，重投已经有38人回复

随心所欲顺其自然

1楼 2010-08-14 10:11:22

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 318.6
帖子: 263
在线: 31.5小时
虫号: 964383
注册: 2010-03-08
性别: MM
专业: 半导体

引用回帖:

Originally posted by polestar007 at 2010-08-14 10:29:15:

哪有不错啊，TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal

这一个就要了命了！再加上图片！

其他那些明显的无关紧要！

再说后面的几个问题，档次一下就下来了

那好吧，那还是改投吧，其实一直不是很明白那个marginal什么意思