| 查看: 2084 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
carno木虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
国外评阅人的回复，各位牛人帮忙小弟看看，还有戏不？ 已有11人参与
|
||
|
This manuscript, as-written, is not yet ready for IJMP. The subject matter is suitable, though it is much better suited to a journal such as Hydrometallurgy. The manuscript is full of grammatical errors to the point of being very distracting to the reader. I made corrections in the initial part just to highlight the type of changes that authors must make. It would be best if the authors seek professional service for fixing the English. Also this manuscript does not appear to be a full length research paper. It is at best a Technical Note. Lee et al (2005) used dithionite. And the current authors used thiosulfate. So this is nothing revolutionary. The authors have not articulated the novelty of their work. Is thiosulfate better than dithionite? What are the advantages of thiosulfate? My recommendation is that the authors should thoroughly revise the manuscript and submit it as a technical note. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问社科规划办官网上的“项目查询模块”与“项目申报模块”的账号密码一样吗？
已经有3人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有9人回复
-
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有15人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有5人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有12人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
carno
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1734.6
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 109
- 在线: 213.8小时
- 虫号: 556119
- 注册: 2008-05-10
- 专业: 矿物工程与物质分离科学
14楼2010-07-20 23:59:43
hudasuhai
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 13 (小学生)
- 金币: 2964.5
- 散金: 131
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1310
- 在线: 386.2小时
- 虫号: 748711
- 注册: 2009-04-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 元素化学
3楼2010-07-20 10:55:49
4楼2010-07-20 11:01:48
hunter666
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 338.8
- 散金: 20
- 帖子: 163
- 在线: 32.3小时
- 虫号: 623597
- 注册: 2008-10-12
- 专业: 植物生理与生化
5楼2010-07-20 11:02:52