24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2025级博士研究生招生报考通知
查看: 1814  |  回复: 8
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

越走越远

铜虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 【求助】大家帮忙看一下我做的激发态已有5人参与

各位帮忙看一下我做的激发态,

输入如下:
#p LC-WPBE/6-31g(d) td=(nstates=20,direct,singlet) scrf=(pcm,solvent=t
oluene) pop=full

结果为:
Excited State   1:      Singlet-EU     2.1766 eV  569.61 nm  f=0.0148  =0.000
      94 -> 96         0.46537
      95 -> 97         0.53687
      94 <- 96         0.11978
      95 <- 97         0.11527
感觉应该不会出现94 <- 96 和 95 <- 97呀,各位帮忙分析一下原因吧!!!
回复此楼
吃得苦中苦,方为人上人
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

c111999

铜虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by yongleli at 2010-07-21 17:06:33:


请给个文献?

我记得
K. Burke, J. Werschnik, and E. K. U. Gross, J. Chem.
Phys. 123: 062206(2005)
说过,Casida推导过,TD-DFT计算方程最后能化简
为一个非Hermite矩阵的本征值问题:

(A B)(x ...

谢谢指正 -1

TDDFT/TDHF相当于CISD,更准确地说是CCSD
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 109, No. 19, 15 November 1998

“the TDDFT results rival the very accurate
equation of motion coupled cluster singles and doubles
(EOM-CCSD) calculations”

关于为何TDDFT比CIS好的原因
“Mathematically, this is also identical to computing matrix ele-
ments between doubly excited states and the ground state.
Thus we see that RPA includes higher order correlation ef-
fects through double excitations that are not being accounted
for in the configuration interaction singles method.”

关于去激发态无物理意义
Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4009−4037

This statement ought to reflect the attempt to give a math-
ematical procedure a physical meaning, but of course,
the “de-excitations” are nonphysical since one cannot
de-excite the Hartree Fock ground state. Historically
one can justify this statement, since TDHF (RPA) has
been constructed to include correlation effects in the
ground state by virtue of some classes of “doubly
excited“ Slater determinants, and in this context, one
can indeed speak about “de-excited” states.
……
This again is indicated by the magni-
tude of the Y amplitudes, which are a measure of the
ground-state correlation and which, as a consequence,
should be small compared to the X amplitudes.

[ Last edited by c111999 on 2010-7-21 at 21:46 ]
9楼2010-07-21 21:43:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

lihb734

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

站在计算化学入门的门槛上

★ ★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
aylayl08(金币+2):谢谢讨论 2010-07-14 09:37:54
TDDFT是基于激发和去激发的理论,这个只能说明你的去激发贡献很重要,其实你只要输入IOP(9/40=2)都可以得到去激发贡献。
不过我也不知道什么是去激发,是不是就是从空轨道又回答占据轨道,相当于发射?请高手指教。
前途光明,出路难觅!
2楼2010-07-13 10:24:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

faqianliu

银虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这个,是高斯算的么
3楼2010-07-13 16:18:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

越走越远

铜虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by faqianliu at 2010-07-13 16:18:01:
这个,是高斯算的么

是啊~~~
吃得苦中苦,方为人上人
4楼2010-07-13 18:01:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见