| 查看: 2134 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
jinronghua至尊木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
稿件被拒，打算回信力争 已有7人参与
|
||
| The manuscript contains little new information that is not already available in the literature. The target application is new but there are 10 papers (Scopus search) that describe a similar set of experiments for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source. Thus, the current manuscript lacks the novelty required for publication in the Journal of Chromatography. The manuscript is well-written and the application should be of interest to a phytoanalytical journal since ionic liquids are considered novel solvents with respect to their use in practical applications. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿中南化学337求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
281求调剂（0805）
已经有23人回复
-
265求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
279分求调剂 一志愿211
已经有10人回复
-
招收调剂硕士
已经有12人回复
-
296求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
招收博士1-2人
已经有3人回复
-
085700资源与环境308求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
274求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 稿件被拒，伤心中……
已经有55人回复
- 我发了封催稿的信。编辑回信“I need ECM # for search”。ECM是什么意思呀？
已经有4人回复
- 论文投稿被拒，申诉快两周不回信，怎么办
已经有9人回复
- 被拒后，外导给的回信
已经有14人回复
- 如果稿件被拒了，可不可以给编辑写信争取一下？
已经有16人回复
- 稿件修回时超过规定期限，会被拒稿吗？
已经有8人回复
- 老外的回信，看是不是被婉拒了？
已经有8人回复
- 被拒的稿件是否可以重投同一刊物
已经有9人回复
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
我刚一篇申诉的文章被JMC接受，感觉确实不容易，关键是你的文章是否真的有价值以及审稿人的意见是否片面或者不正确。如果审稿人确实有不对的地方，先自己心平气和几天然后再做申诉，重要的是审稿人不可能全为错误，毕竟有些意见是好的，而且可能自己的工作确实有不到位的，仔细修改，语气很重要，一定要缓和要不连编辑这关也通过不了。申诉最重要的是你反驳的有理有据，多引用文献去解释你的问题，或者干脆补做试验去证明审稿人的不足。千万别改都不改就直接去申诉，这样几乎不可能。我的这篇文章实际上审稿人很不讲道理的，但是毕竟人家花时间去看你文章，所以还是要温和的反驳，别直接就说“你是错的”，记住编辑是站在审稿人一边的。 总之，楼主要先冷静下来，在有理有据的申诉。祝你好运！ PS：看了下楼主的申诉信，语气不行，建议还是冷下来一两天，重新写下！ [ Last edited by mouse3511 on 2010-7-5 at 09:53 ] |
10楼2010-07-05 09:51:48
jinronghua
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 10331.6
- 散金: 528
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 7837
- 在线: 685.3小时
- 虫号: 735430
- 注册: 2009-03-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药剂学
这样回复怎么样
mandolin:还是要详尽的列举这几个paper，每个与你的不同 2010-07-02 23:05:05
|
Dear editors: I have read your comments: “The manuscript contains little new information that is not already available in the literature. The target application is new but there are 10 papers (Scopus search) that describe a similar set of experiments for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source. Thus, the current manuscript lacks the novelty required for publication in the Journal of Chromatography. The manuscript is well-written and the application should be of interest to a phytoanalytical journal since ionic liquids are considered novel solvents with respect to their use in practical applications.” And I have also read the 10 papers as you describe using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials. Admittedly, we exploit the same method apparently. However, The mechanisms applied are different. Their extraction methods as you mention use ionic liquid as microwave absorbing medium. On the contrary, we use ionic liquid as 。。。。. It is well known that the ionic liquid 1-N-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride can dissolve a great quantity of cellulose. Therefore, we exploit this property and use [C4mim)Cl 。。。。. Several solvents were used to extract active ingredients from plant materials when cellulose was dissolved in the 。。。. Microwave just improve the 。。。 rate. I wish you can reconsider our manuscript. Thank you Best regards Sincerely, Dr Xiaoning An |
2楼2010-07-02 22:55:28
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
3楼2010-07-02 23:04:05
jinronghua
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 10331.6
- 散金: 528
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 7837
- 在线: 685.3小时
- 虫号: 735430
- 注册: 2009-03-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药剂学
5楼2010-07-02 23:12:36
