24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jinronghua

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

应助: 11 (小学生)
金币: 10331.6
散金: 528
红花: 1
帖子: 7837
在线: 685.3小时
虫号: 735430
注册: 2009-03-30
性别: GG
专业: 药剂学

[交流] 稿件被拒，打算回信力争已有7人参与

The manuscript contains little new information that is not already available in the literature. The target application is new but there are 10 papers (Scopus search) that describe a similar set of experiments for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source. Thus, the current manuscript lacks the novelty required for publication in the Journal of Chromatography. The manuscript is well-written and the application should be of interest to a phytoanalytical journal since ionic liquids are considered novel solvents with respect to their use in practical applications.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

稿件被拒，伤心中…… 已经有55人回复
我发了封催稿的信。编辑回信“I need ECM # for search”。ECM是什么意思呀？已经有4人回复
论文投稿被拒，申诉快两周不回信，怎么办已经有9人回复
被拒后，外导给的回信已经有14人回复
如果稿件被拒了，可不可以给编辑写信争取一下？已经有16人回复
稿件修回时超过规定期限，会被拒稿吗？已经有8人回复
老外的回信，看是不是被婉拒了？已经有8人回复
被拒的稿件是否可以重投同一刊物已经有9人回复

失败并不可怕；可怕的是不去尝试。

1楼 2010-07-02 22:52:26

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

jinronghua

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

应助: 11 (小学生)
金币: 10331.6
散金: 528
红花: 1
帖子: 7837
在线: 685.3小时
虫号: 735430
注册: 2009-03-30
性别: GG
专业: 药剂学

这样回复怎么样

mandolin:还是要详尽的列举这几个paper，每个与你的不同 2010-07-02 23:05:05

Dear editors:
I have read your comments: “The manuscript contains little new information that is not already available in the literature. The target application is new but there are 10 papers (Scopus search) that describe a similar set of experiments for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source. Thus, the current manuscript lacks the novelty required for publication in the Journal of Chromatography. The manuscript is well-written and the application should be of interest to a phytoanalytical journal since ionic liquids are considered novel solvents with respect to their use in practical applications.”
And I have also read the 10 papers as you describe using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials. Admittedly, we exploit the same method apparently. However, The mechanisms applied are different. Their extraction methods as you mention use ionic liquid as microwave absorbing medium. On the contrary, we use ionic liquid as 。。。。. It is well known that the ionic liquid 1-N-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride can dissolve a great quantity of cellulose. Therefore, we exploit this property and use [C4mim)Cl 。。。。. Several solvents were used to extract active ingredients from plant materials when cellulose was dissolved in the 。。。. Microwave just improve the 。。。 rate.
I wish you can reconsider our manuscript.
Thank you
Best regards
Sincerely,
Dr Xiaoning An