| 查看: 5613 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
huntingman新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
第一篇英文审稿意见，大修，请大家看看有没有希望？ 已有13人参与
|
||
|
编辑给出的意见是Major revision 审稿专家1的意见： Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author A modeling****** shown in the manuscript. The model is compared with previous models and some conclusions are obtained with numerical simulation. This study is interesting and I recommend this manuscript to be published in your journal after some revision. A few technical comments on the content follow: 1. The English of the manuscript must be improved before resubmission. The author should pay particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the expression of the study is clear to the reader. A tortuous statement, especially in introduction, is weary for reader. The same contents should not be shown repeatedly. 2. Some representations in this manuscript are overstated or inaccurate. For example, “*********. 3. How to verify the employed model of ****** presented by Aini is reasonable. A simple expression, “…… is very similar to *** ……” at line 16 on page 5 and “…… is adopted as the model of ***** ……” at line 58 on page 5, is unable to provide a reasonable explanation. 4. The author should make a clear distinction between the models of **** and ****. In the mathematic sense, the model of ******is just a special case of the model of *******. The author should not only focus on the literatures [16, 17]. Thus, the modeling for ****** on section 2.2 is not a new idea. 5. What is the rationale for the STABLE shown in Fig. 8 and corresponding context on page 13. Do you mean the dynamic stability? If it is, how do you determine the stable range and why do the dynamic behaviors of the unstable motion not emerge? 6. The nonlinear dynamic behaviors , which are of considerable interest, should be given in the paper. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author Questions:the motion equation isn't easy for understanding. the author should give detailed instructions or its deriving steps. Is the shaft considered to be elastic? which terms in equations refer to its restore force? 正在写审稿回复，心里感觉很忐忑，毕业就全靠这篇英文了，结果还是大修。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料科学与工程求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿大连理工大学材料求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿北化085600材料专硕275|有文章专利｜求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料求调剂 一志愿哈工大总分298分，前三科223分
已经有8人回复
-
274求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
合肥区域性重点一本招收调剂
已经有4人回复
-
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有10人回复
-
22408 359分调剂
已经有7人回复
-
抱歉
已经有4人回复
-
085602化工求调剂（331分）
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 这是国外的审稿意见，大家帮看看是否有希望录用？
已经有11人回复
- 请大家看看这个审稿意见，我觉得比较含糊，不知道如何回答，还是补充实验？
已经有23人回复
- journal of materials chemistry审稿意见，大修和大修后再审，是否有希望？
已经有9人回复
- 投了一篇英文文章，审稿人肯定了想法，但是建议据稿。可主编给出大修。
已经有22人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见是大修还是小修，接收概率多大
已经有9人回复
- JPS 大修后，编辑让改英语，接收希望大吗？
已经有27人回复
- 大修时对英语写作做了相应修改，应该如何回复审稿人意见
已经有4人回复
- 英文文章大修后如何投稿
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见，第一次投稿不知道还有没有戏？大家帮助看看，导师不管，没有人问
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
3楼2010-06-23 16:02:30
feitian1984
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 326.8
- 散金: 444
- 帖子: 816
- 在线: 42.6小时
- 虫号: 940460
- 注册: 2010-01-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋地质学
2楼2010-06-23 15:58:00
jinguofeng
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 344
- 帖子: 125
- 在线: 268.4小时
- 虫号: 633759
- 注册: 2008-10-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 食品加工技术
5楼2010-06-23 16:44:28
rfzhy
木虫 (正式写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 2876.4
- 散金: 5
- 红花: 43
- 帖子: 663
- 在线: 230.7小时
- 虫号: 445369
- 注册: 2007-10-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机非金属类电介质与电解
6楼2010-06-23 16:47:22
