24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2976  |  回复: 29

hudasuhai

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 意见回来了!!已有17人参与

Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 意见回来了!!三个专家,两个同意,意见还是不错,另外一个专家的意见极差。
怎么办啊?而且差意见的专家就是否定了工作,都不知道怎么回复好,编辑给了大修,虫虫们有这样的经历不啊?
指望这文章呢!!!!!!!哎
Review has been completed on your paper. Based on the detailed comments of the reviewers, I am recommending to the Journal Editor that your paper be considered for publication as a Research Paper in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering pending further revision. My recommendation is: Major revisions required.


Reviewer 1:
-this paper has many grammatical and writing errors which are very distracting


-the size of the vessel for the simulations conducted is very small wrt industrial sized vessels, with only minor mentioning of scaling


-No experimental validation or testing to show that this work is valid


-Significance of the work is shallow. Not worthy of this journal.
  
Reviewer 2:
This manuscript presents the numerical analysis of stir casting of aluminum matrix composites using a commercial software package, ANSYS/Fluent. The flow patterns associated with various stirrer configurations, stirring speeds, and stirrer angles were analyzed and the regions and volumes of stagnant and dead zones were examined to determine the optimal process conditions and stirrer and crucible designs. Overall, the study is fairly complete and the predictions seem to be reasonable. However, there are a number of areas that need to be revised, as listed below, for purposes of clarification or completeness prior to publication.


1.     While the results were shown on the axis cross sections, the flow field should be three-dimensional because the geometry of the stirrer blades is not axis symmetrical. Please clarify if the analysis was done in three-dimensions or not. In addition, it looks like only the velocity components are on the plane of the axis cross sections. The authors should also include some prediction results on the planes (r-theta plane) that are perpendicular to the axis of the crucible.


2.     The authors stated that “From initial trials and Reynolds number examination, the k-(zeta) turbulent model and the laminar flow model were chosen to model the mixer system.” However, in the results subsequently presented, it is not clear at all which model (turbulent or laminar) they corresponded to. The authors should include the corresponding Reynolds number and model type in the tables. This will help to substantiate the remarks made by the authors corresponding to Figs. 7 (d) and (e) that state: “.. the turbulence was apparently viewed in the crucible…”


3.     Please include the criteria of stagnant and dead zones (in terms of velocity or other criterion).


4.     The stirrer angle information is missing for Figure 3 and Table 1.


5.     The following sentence (above Table 1) needs to be rewritten: “While the multi-stage stirrer yielded the relatively satisfactory flow pattern to disperse the ceramic particles in the molten matrix compared with the other two stirrer geometries.”


6.     It is not clear what criterion was used to determine that the axial velocity is large enough to suck the air from the fluid surface and cause gas entrapment.


7.     Please elaborate on why the “frictionless” (instead of “no-slip”) boundary condition was imposed on the surface of the crucible.


8.     Page 3: “…, polymerization, etc [15, 16].” should be ““…, polymerization, etc. [15, 16].”


9.     Page 8: “… without a axial suction …” should be “… without an axial suction …”
  
Reviewer 3:
This paper reports theoretical work on the flow behavior of fluid in a stir casting. A finite element method was used to simulate the flow pattern of fluid in a vassal during stir casting. The authors discussed the several parameters that affect the flowing patterns and particle distributions. This is an interesting paper and it is recommended for publication.

文章经历:

这篇文章去年底投了MMP,就一个专家意见,还不错,编辑给大修,返回后,再审,结果被枪毙了,后来按照给的意见,修改投了这期刊,现在还是大修。



苦!苦行僧

真的是大修,修怕了!



这些专家一个意见在天上,一个意见在地下,一个意见这么悬在中间!怎么回复好啊????????????????

[ Last edited by hudasuhai on 2010-6-18 at 08:28 ]
回复此楼
平地拔锄头,步行骑水牛,人从桥上过,桥流水不流
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangchandyf

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
认认真真的按照修改意见改,编辑给了你机会,就说明把握很大了。
存在即合理!!!
2楼2010-06-17 09:13:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bear1984

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
多久回来的消息啊?
3楼2010-06-17 09:21:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hudasuhai

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by bear1984 at 2010-06-17 09:21:27:
多久回来的消息啊?

Paper submitted
28 Feb 10  


Associate Editor assigned
15 Mar 10


Paper review completed
16 Jun 10  


AE recommendation (Major Revisions Required)
16 Jun 10
平地拔锄头,步行骑水牛,人从桥上过,桥流水不流
4楼2010-06-17 09:23:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bear1984

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
真快啊,我一月份投的Decision Support System,现在还没有消息,哎。。。。
5楼2010-06-17 09:25:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

statsky

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
给你修改的机会,说明编委还是倾向于接受你的论文,好好回答审稿者的意见,肯定会录用的。
6楼2010-06-17 09:26:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

felicity6056

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这说明编辑还是比较认可你的工作的。不过你文章的复审者就是那个意见很差的审稿人,如果有信心说服他就好!
7楼2010-06-17 09:26:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hudasuhai

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by bear1984 at 2010-06-17 09:25:44:
真快啊,我一月份投的Decision Support System,现在还没有消息,哎。。。。

也是这个期刊么?
催催啊!
平地拔锄头,步行骑水牛,人从桥上过,桥流水不流
8楼2010-06-17 09:31:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

koushuiji88

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)

好事情,散点金币呀,
9楼2010-06-17 09:34:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hehongwei4103

铜虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
我看成,好好修改
10楼2010-06-17 09:36:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 hudasuhai 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 国自然面上写标书时候写最后发几篇文章合适? +10 shaka-fz 2025-02-04 17/850 2025-02-08 13:53 by teresa张
[找工作] 38岁博士毕业女党员还能从事公务员工作吗 7+5 yuer111111 2025-02-04 18/900 2025-02-08 12:55 by yuer111111
[教师之家] 导师对毕业的研究生要养成来时不用欢迎,走时不用送别的气质,打造朴实无华的人际关系 +14 苏东坡二世 2025-02-03 21/1050 2025-02-08 10:57 by 汪汪锅
[教师之家] 2025年加油 +5 考释杨 2025-02-06 5/250 2025-02-08 10:53 by dewachen
[考研] 280求调剂,22自命题(0854)在职考的很差,还能读其他专业吗 +5 WangDian123 2025-02-05 5/250 2025-02-08 10:18 by Andy_124
[考研] 433分求调剂,化学专业 +8 15100504973 2025-02-06 10/500 2025-02-08 09:50 by kaige
[论文投稿] 共同一作 +9 fang0105 2025-02-05 10/500 2025-02-08 09:11 by qqwei
[教师之家] 在科研上,有没有工业界领先于学术界的情况? +9 csyky2007 2025-02-04 10/500 2025-02-08 08:57 by Quakerbird
[基金申请] 本子撰写中的研究基础问题 5+5 illidanyy 2025-02-05 9/450 2025-02-08 08:52 by 北京莱茵润色
[硕博家园] 2025届博士申请 +5 努力科研的铁匠 2025-02-05 7/350 2025-02-07 22:53 by 芷若清风yu
[考博] 25考博还有导师需要学生吗 +4 My23 2025-02-05 4/200 2025-02-07 20:32 by 走了002
[论文投稿] ACS出版社旗下期刊的投稿过程怎么区分第一通讯单位 +5 chem-yan 2025-02-05 7/350 2025-02-07 20:06 by chem-yan
[考研] 0705 368分求调剂 +3 sober916 2025-02-06 9/450 2025-02-07 17:07 by anmln2015
[论文投稿] 求助Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods期刊投稿网址 20+3 Decemberm 2025-02-05 5/250 2025-02-07 08:29 by 北京莱茵润色
[考博] 申博求助 +3 StarAura 2025-02-05 6/300 2025-02-06 20:17 by 轻松不少随
[基金申请] 春节期间被亲朋好友问收入时?大家是怎么回答的。。。 +25 sjtu2012 2025-02-01 28/1400 2025-02-05 18:47 by 畅21
[硕博家园] 群里的各位老师们,你们那些已经毕业的研究生们,教师节春节还会发祝福短信给你吗? +6 苏东坡二世 2025-02-03 8/400 2025-02-05 15:37 by 苏东坡二世
[教师之家] 求教中年教师未来道路 +10 牧猪人1 2025-02-02 16/800 2025-02-05 13:59 by 屡战屡败
[论文投稿] rsc期刊勘误如何投递操作? 12+3 cmliu1969 2025-02-04 3/150 2025-02-05 00:50 by bobvan
[基金申请] 知名博士谈走亲戚好处是可以交流了解各个行业不至于困在象牙塔内 +3 zju2000 2025-02-04 3/150 2025-02-04 22:42 by r=a(1-sinx)
信息提示
请填处理意见