[½»Á÷] jacsÐÞ¸ÄÖиå»úÂÊ´óÂð£¿---[color=Red]ÒÑÖиå[/color] ÒÑÓÐ26È˲ÎÓë

¸Õ¸ÕÉÏÍø¿´ÁËÏ£¬ÎÄÕÂÒѾ­½ÓÊÕ£¬´óÐÞ=±äСÐÞ=×îºó½ÓÊÜ¡£ºÇºÇ£¡£¡ ¶àл³æÓÑÃǵİïÖú ×î½üͶÁËһƪÃÀ¹ú»¯Ñ§»áÖ¾£¨JACS£©£¬Á½¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬Ò»¸ö˵½¨Òé·¢±íÔÚ±ðµÄÆÚ¿¯£¬ÁíÒ»¸ö½¨ÒéСÐÞºó·¢±í£¬×îºó±à¼­ÒªÇóÎÒÃÇÐ޸ġ£²»ÖªµÀÕâÖÖÇé¿öÖиåµÄ»úÂÊ´óÂ𣿱༭µÄÒâ¼û´óÖÂÈçÏ£º >Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.  It has been examined by expert reviewers who have concluded that the work is of potential interest to the readership of JACS; however, the reviewers raise cogent issues that need proper attention.  Please see the enclosed comments of the reviewers for details regarding the requested changes and/or additions.  I am willing to consider a suitably-revised manuscript that properly addresses the concerns of the reviewers. > >We ask that you submit your revision within 60 days. > >Your manuscript is likely to go back to the present reviewers and possibly to one or more additional new reviewer(s) for further input and advice before any final decision on publication is made.  To help me expedite processing, explicitly address the questions raised by the Editor and reviewers and clearly point out the changes made in the manuscript.  Provide this information in the "Response to Decision Letter" text box when you submit the revised manuscript.  Alternatively, you may attach a file containing your detailed responses, including explanations for disagreeing with any of the suggestions that you have chosen not to follow.  Please annotate a copy of the manuscript to show revisions and track changes for the benefit of the reviewers.  This marked manuscript should be uploaded electronically in the File Upload section as "Supporting Information for Review Only". [ Last edited by dqchen on 2010-6-30 at 05:48 ]

»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥