24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1626  |  回复: 4

gongchangjie

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 【讨论】讨论一下,用ms计算系统能量问题 已有4人参与

用ms计算系统能量问题,计算得出的能量值有三个,
Final energy E=....
Final free energy E-TS=......
NB est.0K energy(E-0.5TS)=......
,这三项各代表什么意思?
如果选择系统最小能量,应该是那一项?谢谢,欢迎讨论,拍砖

[ Last edited by gongchangjie on 2010-6-2 at 10:08 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

第一原理资料汇编

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

物理改变世界!世界因物理而精彩!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gongchangjie

金虫 (正式写手)

555,怎么没有高手回应我一下啊
物理改变世界!世界因物理而精彩!
2楼2010-06-03 09:17:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

guolianshun

金虫 (著名写手)

好像听人家说要看最后一个前边的运算过程中的变化值吧,我也想学习,高手呢?
3楼2010-09-21 15:59:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

夕阳西下

金虫 (著名写手)

★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
ym23(金币+1):欢迎常来交流 2010-09-21 23:27:58
系统最小能量应该是Final free energy E-TS
4楼2010-09-21 22:28:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wanglianli136

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
aylayl08(金币+1):谢谢信息 2010-09-22 09:12:37
zxzj05(金币+1):谢谢回帖交流 2010-09-22 10:51:03
help里有
The CASTEP output is as follows. The line

Final energy, E             =  -861.8315373731     eV

gives the Kohn-Sham energy, EKS, which ignores the entropy. However, it is the total Mermin free energy that is minimized by CASTEP and reported in the SCF cycles in the line

Final free energy (E-TS)    =  -861.8315374521     eV

If you were actually interested in the electronic states at some reasonable nonzero temperature, you would smear the Fermi level with a thermal (i.e., Fermi-Dirac) smearing method and the free energy reported by CASTEP would be the value you require.

However, it is often the T = 0 K value that is required and the smearing is necessary to improve the convergence of the numerical algorithm. As the smearing ('temperature') is increased, the TS term increases and the free energy, EKS - TS, goes down. At the same time, as the entropy contributes more and more to the free energy, the electronic minimization pays less attention to the EKS term, so the final EKS increases. Because the dependence of the free energy and the Kohn-Sham energy on the smearing width is the same (to first order), averaging the two values gives a much better approximation to the T = 0 K result:

NB est. 0K energy (E-0.5TS) =  -861.8315374126     eV
下面两个能量应该是因为smearing的原因
5楼2010-09-22 09:09:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 gongchangjie 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见