| ²é¿´: 924 | »Ø¸´: 8 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
haqiqi½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¬»¹ÓÐÏ£ÍûÂð£¿ÊÇÐ޸ϹÊǸÄͶÆäËüÔÓÖ¾£¿ ÒÑÓÐ6È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
Your manuscript entitled¡°¡Á¡Á¡Á" has been carefully reviewed by the Editorial Board. Although the reviewers felt the manuscript contained some potentially interesting data, I am afraid in its present form it would not have a sufficiently high priority for acceptance for publication. At the present time, we have instituted a priority system for the acceptance of new manuscripts since we are limited each year in the number of pages which we can publish in the journal. Based on our current priority system, your manuscript in its present form would not have a sufficiently high priority for acceptance. However, if you feel you could satisfactorily revise the manuscript along the lines suggested by the reviewers, we would be quite happy to reconsider such a suitably revised manuscript. I must emphasize that no prior commitment can be made concerning the acceptability of the revision as it will depend upon the resolution of the points raised by the reviewers. I am returning to you copies of the reviewers' comments which I hope you find helpful. If you feel you can satisfactorily resolve the points which have been raised, I would appreciate it if you would return to me your revised manuscript as well as a covering letter indicating each change which you have made in response to a comment by the reviewer by Sep 21, 2010. If you feel any of their points are inappropriate, you are certainly free to provide rebuttal in your covering letter. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ҩѧ305Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁѧУ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ɽ¶«Ê¡»ù½ð2026
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúµ÷¼Á£¬¿çµ÷
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
085400µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢Àࣨ´¨´ó¿ØÖƹ¤³Ì£©Çóµ÷¼Á¿É¿çרҵ ÇóÀÏʦÁªÏµ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì281»¹Óе÷¼Á»ú»áÂð
ÒѾÓÐ41È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
290µ÷¼ÁÉúÎï0860
ÒѾÓÐ35È˻ظ´
һ־Ը³¶«´óѧ071000ÉúÎïѧѧ˶³õÊÔ·ÖÊý276Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ30È˻ظ´
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
²ôÔÓ·½ÃæµÄÎÊÌâ ´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´Ò»ÏÂ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
visitor958
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
IEEEÔÓÖ¾Óë»áÒéר¼Ò
- Ó¦Öú: 2283 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.05
- ½ð±Ò: 17310
- É¢½ð: 2544
- ºì»¨: 76
- Ìû×Ó: 15735
- ÔÚÏß: 2926.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 489254
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-01
- רҵ: IEEE
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| "reviewers' comments"ºÃ²»ºÃ´¦Àí£¿¿ÉÒԵϰ£¬µ±È»ÊÇÐÞ¸ÄÖØÍ¶ÁË¡£ÓдóÎÊÌâ²»ÄÜ»ØÓ¦µÄ»°£¬»¹ÊǸÄͶËãÁË¡£ |
5Â¥2010-05-28 20:26:11
haqiqi
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 9428.1
- É¢½ð: 75
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1093
- ÔÚÏß: 84.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 986778
- ×¢²á: 2010-04-01
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ö×ÁöÃâÒß
2Â¥2010-05-28 19:07:56
haqiqi
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 9428.1
- É¢½ð: 75
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1093
- ÔÚÏß: 84.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 986778
- ×¢²á: 2010-04-01
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ö×ÁöÃâÒß
3Â¥2010-05-28 20:10:16
z0216wen
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ
- Ó¦Öú: 170 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 7309.2
- É¢½ð: 1066
- ºì»¨: 17
- Ìû×Ó: 4239
- ÔÚÏß: 848.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 772356
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-17
- רҵ: ²¡Ô΢ÉúÎïÓë¸ÐȾÑо¿ÓëÕï
4Â¥2010-05-28 20:20:35














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥