[交流] Chem Comm审稿意见 仍需努力 已有13人参与

先附上审稿过程供虫友参考： 2010/04/02 Submitted by the author 2010/04/06 License submitted 2010/05/24 Reject & Resubmit ------------------------------------------ 附编辑的信： Dear Dr XXX: Manuscript ID XXX Title:XXX Please find the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript copied below. On consideration of the reviewers' comments I feel that the paper is unsuitable for publication in its present form, and that substantial revisions are necessary before the paper could be reconsidered for publication. I therefore feel unable to proceed with publication at this stage. However, I would like to encourage you to address the concerns of the reviewers and resubmit an appropriately revised manuscript to ChemComm. In particular, further evidence is needed to fully support the claims made. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to further peer review before a decision is reached. You can resubmit your manuscript through your Author Centre at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/chemcomm . Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. Alternatively, follow the link below to create your resubmission: I look forward receiving a resubmission in due course. Your sincerely, Philippa Ross ********************************************************** Philippa Ross Publishing Editor ChemComm Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, UK CB4 0WF Tel +44 (0)1223 432425 Fax +44 (0)1223 420247 www.rsc.org and www.chemsoc.org chemcomm@rsc.org rossp@rsc.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 有经验的虫友觉得这个修改后还会送到这两个审稿人那儿不？ 我导师说文章中的数据不能重新做，否则有伪造数据的嫌疑，只能尽量解释审稿人提出的问题，但是有些问题回答起来很困难啊。。。 [ Last edited by lby1258 on 2010-6-4 at 09:03 ]

回复此楼