应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » Chem Comm审稿意见 仍需努力
161/2返回列表12下一页
查看: 3371  |  回复: 15
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

Jonathon

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Chem Comm审稿意见 仍需努力已有13人参与

先附上审稿过程供虫友参考：
2010/04/02 Submitted by the author
2010/04/06 License submitted
2010/05/24 Reject & Resubmit

------------------------------------------
附编辑的信：

Dear Dr XXX:

Manuscript ID XXX
Title:XXX

Please find the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript copied below. On consideration of the reviewers' comments I feel that the paper is unsuitable for publication in its present form, and that substantial revisions are necessary before the paper could be reconsidered for publication. I therefore feel unable to proceed with publication at this stage.

However, I would like to encourage you to address the concerns of the reviewers and resubmit an appropriately revised manuscript to ChemComm. In particular, further evidence is needed to fully support the claims made. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to further peer review before a decision is reached.

You can resubmit your manuscript through your Author Centre at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/chemcomm . Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. Alternatively, follow the link below to create your resubmission:
I look forward receiving a resubmission in due course.

Your sincerely,

Philippa Ross

**********************************************************
Philippa Ross
Publishing Editor ChemComm
Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House
Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, UK CB4 0WF
Tel +44 (0)1223 432425 Fax +44 (0)1223 420247
www.rsc.org and www.chemsoc.org
chemcomm@rsc.org rossp@rsc.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

有经验的虫友觉得这个修改后还会送到这两个审稿人那儿不？
我导师说文章中的数据不能重新做，否则有伪造数据的嫌疑，只能尽量解释审稿人提出的问题，但是有些问题回答起来很困难啊。。。

[ Last edited by lby1258 on 2010-6-4 at 09:03 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2010-05-25 09:47:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rizhichen

金虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

zhiyongwang

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

wutmail

银虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

jwfu

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

Jonathon

金虫 (小有名气)

conan281

木虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

suchanghong

金虫 (著名写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

Jonathon

金虫 (小有名气)
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Jonathon 的主题更新
161/2返回列表12下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭