| 查看: 1395 | 回复: 17 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
大家帮我看看这篇投Ao的文章还有希望吗已有12人参与
|
|||
|
今年三月份投了AO，今天审稿结束，结论是I prefer to give you a chance to respond to their comments before acting on your manuscript. 下面是审稿人具体的建议，大家帮我看看还有希望吗 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问有知道博士后面上专家评审什么时候结束的么？
已经有4人回复
-
offer选择
已经有8人回复
-
国基在研影响申请结果吗
已经有21人回复
-
省基金太难了
已经有6人回复
-
暑假孩子一个人在家可以干什么
已经有9人回复
-
博后面上今天下午会公布吗？有无消息？
已经有45人回复
-
联培博士文章第一单位署名问题交流~
已经有22人回复
-
专科院校申请国自然
已经有26人回复
-
基金评审时，评审专家还回去看申请人代表作之外的文章吗？
已经有15人回复
-
关于论文第一通讯作者的问题？
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家帮忙看一下这篇文章重投有戏吗？
已经有3人回复
- 意见返回，麻烦大家帮忙看看这是什么意思，还有希望吗
已经有9人回复
- 文章被拒了，编辑希望我重投，帮忙看下重投有希望吗？
已经有9人回复
- 第一次写文章，大家帮我看看这种情况能不能发表
已经有10人回复
- ！！！！！！！！！！请帮我看看编辑的拒稿意见，还有希望吗？
已经有16人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮我看看还有希望吗
已经有3人回复
- 编辑指出文章的两大问题，大家帮我看看还有戏吗？还是委婉拒稿？
已经有8人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个编辑意见修改有希望吗
已经有14人回复
- 大家帮帮忙看下我这篇文章往哪个杂志（英文）投比较好啊
已经有11人回复
|
Preproduction review: > >The following revisions or corrections are MANDATORY. Your manuscript cannot be prepared for the typesetter until the corrections are made. > >Place each figure on a separate page. > >Include a figure caption page. > >You are required to upload electronic figure files in TIFF or EPS format. > >All references must be cited in numerical order throughout the text. > >Remove et. al in your references and list all of the authors. > |
3楼2010-05-20 09:10:06
2楼2010-05-20 09:03:20
|
Reviewer 1 >Comments on Technical Content: > >This paper addresses a novel method to implement flat band slow light in asymmetric photonic crystal waveguide, which is the infiltration microfluidic in one side of the photonic crystal holes. However, some clarifications are required to allow the readers better understanding the paper contents. The main points are: >1- Most of the waveguides are based on symmetric structure, why asymmetric structure is adopted here? An asymmetric waveguide structure will lead to a very low coupling efficiency when it is connected to a conventional strip waveguide. Since loss is also one of the biggest concerns in slow light research community, can you give some discussions about the coupling issue for the proposed waveguide? >2- Because the one side holes are all modified, it makes a new photonic band structure. Thus, it is better to give the photonic band gap ranges for both the unchanged photonic crystals and the changed photonic crystals. You should make sure the guide modes for flat band slow light are all in the band gap. >3- The paper reported that it focused on reducing the GVD, therefore, the GVD value of the waveguide should be given and compared with related works. >4- “Even mode” and “the transverse electric-like (TE) mode” are used in the paper. It sounds like a 3D structure, so the vertical cross of the waveguide should be added in Fig. 1. Also, the structure parameters and the calculation parameters should be given. >5- The paper only reported a plane wave expansion (PWE) method calculation results, either a FDTD simulation or an experiment of the design is preferred to prove the PWE analysis. >6- Why the flat band appears in the structure, it should be given some comments. >7- What’s the range of your optimizing fluid index and why did you chose this? >8- What’s the range of your optimizing holes radius and why did you chose this? >9- The relation of the optimizing parameters nf and R with Delay Bandwidth Product also with the Group Index should be plotted. >10- Add reference for the plane wave expansion (PWE) method. |
4楼2010-05-20 09:13:43
7楼2010-05-20 09:21:14
5