24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 762  |  回复: 1

leijinping7888

禁虫 (初入文坛)

本帖内容被屏蔽

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lb1586551

铜虫 (小有名气)

★ ★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
aylayl08(金币+2):谢谢讨论 2010-05-17 18:26:53
There is no unique answer to this question. The major problem is the limitation of the active space to 12-15 orbitals enforced by the method. In most cases this is no problem and the choice of active orbitals is obvious (for example the pi-orbitals in a conjugated system). The answer depends strongly on the problem under consideration. If it is a GS energy surface one should be careful to include all orbitals the occupation number of which may vary considerable along the path(s) followed on the surface. In excited states studies one need to include enough orbitals to describe the excited states. This often means both valence and Rydberg type orbitals.
In difficult cases it might be advantageous by starting a study with a RASSCF calculation where RAS2 only includes the open shell orbitals (if any), RAS1 the orbitals that can possibly be interesting as active, and RAS3 the corresponding correlating orbitals (often one just chooses all valence orbitals). By allowing 2-4 electrons in RAS3 one can get quite a good description of the near degeneracies. The result can be used to choose an active space for a CASSCF/CASPT2 calculation. Note that this test calculation may have to be performed on several places on an energy surface. In CASSCF calculations one should preferably use the same active space over the whole surface.
2楼2010-05-17 11:25:11
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 学员NQWC8z 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +6 349506619 2026-08-28 6/300 2026-08-31 08:43 by kingkocxr
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +10 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 19/950 2026-08-31 08:01 by blueearth171
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +6 gdd2018 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 08:58 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 (EPI+1)(金币+50) +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
信息提示
请填处理意见