【求助】高斯CASSCF的mannual和方法 - 量子化学 - Gaussian

版块导航: 正在加载中...

登录注册

应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

高斯批处理已经有8人回复
高斯计算的问题？？已经有5人回复
高斯 gaussian 在 windows7 中充分利用多核已经有19人回复
急求用高斯09怎么计算电子激发态已经有7人回复
关于高斯稳定结构的问题已经有3人回复
高斯计算两个有机分子已经有11人回复
在进行高斯计算时如何消去虚频（转载）已经有18人回复
高斯计算中zORA方法是否可以使用已经有9人回复
高斯中键伸缩力常数与键角力常数的计算已经有6人回复
dmol 中的GGA-RPBE相当于高斯中的什么计算方法？已经有5人回复
高斯view中调节键长时怎么使四五个原子组成一个团（group）,和另一个原子之间进行调节已经有4人回复
【求助】高斯中过渡金属的基组和方法选择已经有24人回复
【求助】高斯计算过渡态不收敛，请问如何解决？已经有8人回复

1楼 2010-05-17 10:12:14

已阅关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

lb1586551

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 5 (幼儿园)
金币: 2289.5
散金: 3
红花: 1
帖子: 216
在线: 33.8小时
虫号: 641019
注册: 2008-10-30
性别: GG
专业: 化学环境污染与健康

★ ★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
aylayl08(金币+2):谢谢讨论 2010-05-17 18:26:53

There is no unique answer to this question. The major problem is the limitation of the active space to 12-15 orbitals enforced by the method. In most cases this is no problem and the choice of active orbitals is obvious (for example the pi-orbitals in a conjugated system). The answer depends strongly on the problem under consideration. If it is a GS energy surface one should be careful to include all orbitals the occupation number of which may vary considerable along the path(s) followed on the surface. In excited states studies one need to include enough orbitals to describe the excited states. This often means both valence and Rydberg type orbitals.
In difficult cases it might be advantageous by starting a study with a RASSCF calculation where RAS2 only includes the open shell orbitals (if any), RAS1 the orbitals that can possibly be interesting as active, and RAS3 the corresponding correlating orbitals (often one just chooses all valence orbitals). By allowing 2-4 electrons in RAS3 one can get quite a good description of the near degeneracies. The result can be used to choose an active space for a CASSCF/CASPT2 calculation. Note that this test calculation may have to be performed on several places on an energy surface. In CASSCF calculations one should preferably use the same active space over the whole surface.

赞一下(2人)

回复此楼

2楼2010-05-17 11:25:11