24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2450  |  回复: 30
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

slyang2005

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 结果是拒稿还是大修? 已有23人参与

稿了个国外的SSCI期刊,11天就有回复了。


Refereeing for this manuscript has been completed.

The referees conclude that this is an interesting paper, and the results should
be published. However, in its present form, the paper is unsuitable for
publication in XXX(期刊名).

In brief, they comment that the main findings of the paper - XXXXXXX (篇名)- while novel, is not sufficiently
original or interesting in itself to justify a full paper in XXX(期刊名).

They recommend that either (1) the results be presented as a short
communication, or (2) the analysis and discussion be extended considerably, and
a rewritten paper submitted.
The full comments of the referees are given in the attached file.

best wishes

请帮忙看一下,还有没有希望?

[ Last edited by slyang2005 on 2010-4-24 at 18:13 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qing9819

金虫 (著名写手)


slyang2005(金币+1):谢谢参与
让改成通讯或全文吧,很有希望中,祝福LZ!
5楼2010-04-24 18:44:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 slyang2005 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见