| 查看: 1472 | 回复: 23 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
是否是完全拒绝？还是可以修改后再投？ 已有15人参与
|
|||
|
I regret to inform you that the reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication, and I must therefore reject it. For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are included below. I encourage you to work some more on this project to address the serious criticisms raised by the reviewers. You can then submit a new manuscript that will be subjected to a new cycle of reviews. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, K. Osseo-Asare Editor Hydrometallurgy Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: GENERAL This paper focused on an important topic on the utilisation of electrolytic manganese (EM) residue as a potential source of manganese recovery. Conventional processing procedures for production of EM were employed for the leaching and purification steps followed by preparation of Mn3O4 product. However, the paper was not well structured and the quality of English was not adequate. It was not technically and economically justified to test the roasting method based on the existing knowledge. It is suggested to revise the paper including (1) rearraging the paper by shortening and moving any relevant and necessary literature parts into the introduction section, (2) omitting roasting related information and results including figures, (3) including information about equipment used for the testing, test scale, parameters monitoring and control, chemical grade, (4) omitting Figures 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and Tables 2, (5) discussing test results based on chemical assay results with additional visual observations, (6) changing the writing styles to paper formats, (7) giving sufficient references for the literature reviewed which are not well known knowledge, and (8) improving the quality of English. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有16人回复
-
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有16人回复
-
人工智能虚构史料、伪造文献频现，多家期刊声明抵制
已经有4人回复
-
CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿SEM图像异常分析
已经有8人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有9人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有12人回复
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
6楼2010-04-06 23:01:15
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2010-04-06 22:51:13
|
另外一个审稿人的意见是 要修改 Reviewer #2: This paper shows interesting results. Two methods were applied to reuse EMR by means of leaching with sulfuric acid, roasting EMR with ammonium salts respectively. However, the text must be revised. Some comments are given below: 第一个说 我的其中一种方法不适用，我觉得也是。其实都不怎么实用，科研嘛，很多都不太实用。 大家觉得我可以按照他们的要求修改后，可以继续投吗？ |
3楼2010-04-06 22:52:54
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2010-04-06 22:54:13