| 查看: 1134 | 回复: 23 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
是否是完全拒绝？还是可以修改后再投？ 已有15人参与
|
|||
|
I regret to inform you that the reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication, and I must therefore reject it. For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are included below. I encourage you to work some more on this project to address the serious criticisms raised by the reviewers. You can then submit a new manuscript that will be subjected to a new cycle of reviews. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, K. Osseo-Asare Editor Hydrometallurgy Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: GENERAL This paper focused on an important topic on the utilisation of electrolytic manganese (EM) residue as a potential source of manganese recovery. Conventional processing procedures for production of EM were employed for the leaching and purification steps followed by preparation of Mn3O4 product. However, the paper was not well structured and the quality of English was not adequate. It was not technically and economically justified to test the roasting method based on the existing knowledge. It is suggested to revise the paper including (1) rearraging the paper by shortening and moving any relevant and necessary literature parts into the introduction section, (2) omitting roasting related information and results including figures, (3) including information about equipment used for the testing, test scale, parameters monitoring and control, chemical grade, (4) omitting Figures 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and Tables 2, (5) discussing test results based on chemical assay results with additional visual observations, (6) changing the writing styles to paper formats, (7) giving sufficient references for the literature reviewed which are not well known knowledge, and (8) improving the quality of English. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有12人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有13人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有12人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2010-04-06 22:51:13
|
另外一个审稿人的意见是 要修改 Reviewer #2: This paper shows interesting results. Two methods were applied to reuse EMR by means of leaching with sulfuric acid, roasting EMR with ammonium salts respectively. However, the text must be revised. Some comments are given below: 第一个说 我的其中一种方法不适用，我觉得也是。其实都不怎么实用，科研嘛，很多都不太实用。 大家觉得我可以按照他们的要求修改后，可以继续投吗？ |
3楼2010-04-06 22:52:54
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2010-04-06 22:54:13
ashao
银虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3269.8
- 散金: 265
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 2194
- 在线: 193小时
- 虫号: 230992
- 注册: 2006-03-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 应用高分子化学与物理
5楼2010-04-06 22:58:50
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
6楼2010-04-06 23:01:15
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
你这个当然要好好修改，甚至重写一下，然后投回去。接收的可能性很大，第二个审稿人评价不错，编辑又给机会，对审稿人和编辑都客气点，谢谢他们的意见。他们这次应该放过你了。 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1917936 [ Last edited by visitor958 on 2010-4-6 at 23:04 ] |
7楼2010-04-06 23:01:41
8楼2010-04-06 23:13:42
|
你这个当然要好好修改，甚至重写一下，然后投回去。接收的可能性很大，第二个审稿人评价不错，编辑又给机会，对审稿人和编辑都客气点，谢谢他们的意见。他们这次应该放过你了。 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1917936 Quote: Originally posted by ptf1242 at 2010-04-06 22:52:54: 另外一个审稿人的意见是 要修改 Reviewer #2: This paper shows interesting results. Two methods were applied to reuse EMR by means of leaching with sulfuric acid, roasting EMR with ammonium salts r ... |
9楼2010-04-06 23:13:59
10楼2010-04-06 23:17:44