24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2643  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yaozhangwh

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 第一次投稿,两个评审意见相差很大,咋办已有9人参与

投了篇PHYS REV E,两个月了昨天回来了评审意见
These comments suggest that the present version of the manuscript is
not suitable for publication in the Physical Review.  However, if you
feel that you can refute the criticisms, we will give further
consideration.  Please accompany any resubmittal by a summary of the
changes made and a brief response to all recommendations and
criticisms.

First Referee
The paper contains the results of the numerical
simulation with little analysis of the data. The method is fairly
standard and the results are consistent with expectations. Similar
problems have been solved by others. The new twist in this paper is
that the authors consider dielectric layers that coat the electrodes.
In my opinion, the paper does not provide sufficient new information
and insights to justify its publication in the archival literature.

How can the authors improve the paper? They could possibly ........

Second Referee
The results appear interesting to me and
obviously obtained by careful calculations. The presentation is
accessible and the figures are insightful. I estimate that the paper
can be recommended for publication in the PRE, after consideration of
a few suggestions.
大家觉得我修改的话,有希望搞定第一个评审部
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangbin07

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

新虫 (初入文坛)

优秀版主优秀版主

第一个审稿人不看好啊,LZ好好修改一下,可以再重投,换审稿人。
If you can't take a few risks now so early in your career you probably never will.
3楼2010-04-04 11:44:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

smilerobin

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

要有足够的新意啊
2楼2010-04-04 11:37:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperpublishing

铜虫 (著名写手)

好好修改,有机会
RPisalwaysinbalance
4楼2010-04-04 11:50:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

长临河

铜虫 (正式写手)

认真修改并回答好第一个审稿人的意见,把工作的新意解释清楚,
应该可以修改通过吧?
6楼2010-04-04 14:54:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见