24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2762  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yaozhangwh

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 第一次投稿,两个评审意见相差很大,咋办 已有9人参与

投了篇PHYS REV E,两个月了昨天回来了评审意见
These comments suggest that the present version of the manuscript is
not suitable for publication in the Physical Review.  However, if you
feel that you can refute the criticisms, we will give further
consideration.  Please accompany any resubmittal by a summary of the
changes made and a brief response to all recommendations and
criticisms.

First Referee
The paper contains the results of the numerical
simulation with little analysis of the data. The method is fairly
standard and the results are consistent with expectations. Similar
problems have been solved by others. The new twist in this paper is
that the authors consider dielectric layers that coat the electrodes.
In my opinion, the paper does not provide sufficient new information
and insights to justify its publication in the archival literature.

How can the authors improve the paper? They could possibly ........

Second Referee
The results appear interesting to me and
obviously obtained by careful calculations. The presentation is
accessible and the figures are insightful. I estimate that the paper
can be recommended for publication in the PRE, after consideration of
a few suggestions.
大家觉得我修改的话,有希望搞定第一个评审部
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaozhangwh

新虫 (初入文坛)

谢谢大家了,其实我觉得新意上应该是没有问题的,这个方向是我老板让我做的,是有人算过做过类似的模型,但他们加的条件很简单和我的不一样,算的问题也不一样,而且我的模型也改进了,不然第二个审稿人也不会说 the figures are insightful,感觉第一个审稿人写的意见就根据我的introducation来写的,等假完了再和老板好好算量了
9楼2010-04-04 18:19:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yaozhangwh 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见